← Back to search

Topological superconductivity from first-principles II: Effects from manipulation of spin spirals $-$ Topological fragmentation, braiding, and Quasi-Majorana Bound States

András Lászlóffy, Bendegúz Nyári, Gábor Csire, László Szunyogh, Balázs Újfalussy

arXiv:2308.13831 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.108.134513 · 2023-08-26 · Physical Review B

T3experimental9 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Recent advances in electron spin resonance techniques have allowed the manipulation of the spin of individual atoms, making magnetic atomic chains on superconducting hosts one of the most promising platform where topological superconductivity can be engineered. Motivated by this progress, we provide a detailed, quantitative description of the effects of manipulating spins in realistic nanowires by applying a first-principles-based computational approach to a recent experiment: an iron chain deposited on top of Au/Nb heterostructure. As a continuation of the first part of the paper experimentally relevant computational experiments are performed in spin spiral chains that shed light on several concerns about practical applications and add new aspects to the interpretation of recent experiments. We explore the stability of topological zero energy states, the formation and distinction of topologically trivial and non-trivial zero energy edge states, the effect of local changes in the exchange fields, the emergence of topological fragmentation, and the shift of Majorana Zero Modes along the superconducting nanowires opening avenues toward the implementation of a braiding operation.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9.96Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers