Microscopic scales and mechanism of quantum phase transitions in two-dimensional superconducting systems
Andrey Rogachev, Samuel Feldman, Kevin Davenport
arXiv:2309.00747 · 2023-09-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The superconducting ground state in many two-dimensional materials can be created or destroyed through quantum phase transitions (QPTs) controlled by non-thermal parameters such as carrier density or magnetic field. While various mechanisms for these QPTs have been proposed, it remains unclear which, if any, are applicable to a specific two-dimensional superconducting system. Here, we find that a pair-breaking mechanism which suppresses the Cooper pair density gives a unifying description of magnetic-field-driven QPTs in amorphous MoGe, Pb and TaN films, and the high-temperature superconductor La$_{1.92}$Sr$_{0.08}$CuO$_{4}$. This transition occurs within the superconducting subsystem and is masked by the dominant non-critical contribution of normal electrons. The discovery was enabled by the development of a QPT model that goes beyond the conventional determination of the critical exponents and incorporates into the analysis a microscopic length scale characterizing the transitions. We found that in the materials studied, and MoGe nanowires, this scale corresponds to the size of a Cooper pair. The model has also been successfully applied to QPTs in Josephson junction arrays and various non-superconducting materials. The observation that microscopic scales are encoded in the scaled experimental data of QPTs likely extends beyond equilibrium condensed matter physics and may reveal underlying principles of critical phenomena in a wide variety of systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo50Ge50 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo78Ge22 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.92Sr0.08CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The 2D attractive Hubbard model and the BCS-BEC crossover
similarity 0.89Rodrigo A. Fontenele et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.02156
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of the Coherence Length and the Cooper-Pair Size in Unconventional Superconductors by Tunnelling Spectroscopy
similarity 0.88A. Mourachkine · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0405602
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum phase transition in small-size 1d and 2d Josephson junction arrays: analysis of the experiments within the interacting plasmons picture
similarity 0.88Samuel Feldman & Andrey Rogachev · 2024 · arXiv:2411.06492
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Behavior of the Meissner Transition in the Lattice London Superconductor
similarity 0.88Peter Olsson & S. Teitel · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9710200
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Oscillatory magnetic field-dependent critical temperatures of ultraclean Type-II superconductors
similarity 0.87Aiying Zhao et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.05111
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal properties of cuprate superconductors: Evidence and Implications
similarity 0.87T. Schneider · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0204236
Source status unknown — claims are unverified