Andreev reflection of quantum Hall states through a quantum point contact
Mehdi Hatefipour, Joseph J. Cuozzo, Ido Levy, William M. Strickland, Dylan Langone, Enrico Rossi, Javad Shabani
arXiv:2309.01856 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035430 · 2023-09-04 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the interplay between the quantum Hall (QH) effect and superconductivity in InAs surface quantum well (SQW)/NbTiN heterostructures using a quantum point contact (QPC). We use QPC to control the proximity of the edge states to the superconductor. By measuring the upstream and downstream resistances of the device, we investigate the efficiency of Andreev conversion at the InAs/NbTiN interface. Our experimental data is analyzed using the Landauer-Buttiker formalism, generalized to allow for Andreev reflection processes. We show that by varying the voltage of the QPC, $V_{QPC}$, the average Andreev reflection, $A$, at the QH-SC interface can be tuned from 50% to 10%. The evolution of $A$ with $V_{QPC}$ extracted from the measurements exhibits plateaus separated by regions for which $A$ varies continuously with $V_{QPC}$. The presence of plateaus suggests that for some ranges of $V_{QPC}$ the QPC might be pinching off almost completely from the QH-SC interface some of the edge modes. Our work shows a new experimental setup to control and advance the understanding of the complex interplay between superconductivity and QH effect in two-dimensional electron gas systems.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Microwave-Tunable Diode Effect in Asymmetric SQUIDs with Topological Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.97Joseph J. Cuozzo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.16931
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of the Little-Parks effect in spin-triplet superconductors
similarity 0.94Chengyun Hua et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.04591
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multimodal synchrotron X-ray diffraction across the superconducting transition of SrBiSe
similarity 0.92M. P. Smylie et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.13221
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analysis of Thermal Grooving Effects on Vortex Penetration in Vapor-Diffused Nb3Sn
similarity 0.92Eric M. Lechner et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.01569
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling phonon-mediated quasiparticle poisoning in superconducting qubit arrays
similarity 0.92Eric Yelton et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.15471
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reaching quantum critical point by adding nonmagnetic disorder in single crystals of (CaSr)RhSn superconductor
similarity 0.92Elizabeth H. Krenkel et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.16157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified