Using quantitative magneto-optical imaging to reveal why the ac susceptibility of superconducting films is history-independent
Davi A. D. Chaves, J. C. Corsaletti Filho, E. A. Abbey, D. Bosworth, Z. H. Barber, M. G. Blamire, T. H. Johansen, A. V. Silhanek, W. A. Ortiz, M. Motta
arXiv:2309.08062 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.109.104510 · 2023-09-14 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Measurements of the temperature-dependent ac magnetic susceptibility of superconducting films reveal reversible responses, i.e., irrespective of the magnetic and thermal history of the sample. This experimental fact is observed even in the presence of stochastic and certainly irreversible magnetic flux avalanches which, in principle, should randomly affect the results. In this work, we explain such an apparent contradiction by exploring the spatial resolution of magneto-optical imaging. To achieve this, we successfully compare standard frequency-independent first harmonic ac magnetic susceptibility results for a superconducting thin film with those obtained by ac-emulating magneto-optical imaging (acMOI). A quantitative analysis also provides information regarding flux avalanches, reveals the presence of a vortex-antivortex annihilation zone in the region in which a smooth flux front interacts with pre-established avalanches, and demonstrates that the major impact on the flux distribution within the superconductor happens during the first ac cycle. Our results establish acMOI as a reliable approach for studying frequency-independent ac field effects in superconducting thin films while capturing local aspects of flux dynamics, otherwise inaccessible via global magnetometry techniques.
Similar papers
Increasing superconducting by layering in the attractive Hubbard model
similarity 0.94Rodrigo A. Fontenele et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.17405
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanobridge SQUIDs as multilevel memory elements
similarity 0.94Davi A. D. Chaves et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.08050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-Density Waves vs. Superconductivity: Some Results and Future Perspectives
similarity 0.92Giulia Venditti & Sergio Caprara · 2023 · arXiv:2305.03404
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport features of a topological superconducting nanowire with a quantum dot: conductance and noise
similarity 0.92Leonel Gruñeiro et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.02040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced weak superconductivity in trigonal -PtBi
similarity 0.92J. Zabala et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.00105
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chirped pulse control over the melting of superconductors
similarity 0.92Maria Recasens et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.04538
Source status unknown — claims are unverified