← Back to search

Absence of $E_{2g}$ nematic instability and dominant $A_{1g}$ response in the kagome metal CsV$_3$Sb$_5$

Zhaoyu Liu, Yue Shi, Qianni Jiang, Elliott W. Rosenberg, Jonathan M. DeStefano, Jinjin Liu, Chaowei Hu, Yuzhou Zhao, Zhiwei Wang, Yugui Yao, David Graf, Pengcheng Dai, Jihui Yang, Xiaodong Xu, Jiun-Haw Chu

arXiv:2309.14574 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.031015 · 2023-09-25 · Physical Review X

T3experimental3 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Ever since the discovery of the charge density wave (CDW) transition in the kagome metal CsV$_3$Sb$_5$, the nature of its symmetry breaking is under intense debate. While evidence suggests that the rotational symmetry is already broken at the CDW transition temperature ($T_{\rm CDW}$), an additional electronic nematic instability well below $T_{\rm CDW}$ has been reported based on the diverging elastoresistivity coefficient in the anisotropic channel ($m_{E_{2g}}$). Verifying the existence of a nematic transition below $T_{\rm CDW}$ is not only critical for establishing the correct description of the CDW order parameter, but also important for understanding low-temperature superconductivity. Here, we report elastoresistivity measurements of CsV$_3$Sb$_5$ using three different techniques probing both isotropic and anisotropic symmetry channels. Contrary to previous reports, we find the anisotropic elastoresistivity coefficient $m_{E_{2g}}$ is temperature-independent, except for a step jump at $T_{\rm CDW}$. The absence of nematic fluctuations is further substantiated by measurements of the elastocaloric effect, which show no enhancement associated with nematic susceptibility. On the other hand, the symmetric elastoresistivity coefficient $m_{A_{1g}}$ increases below $T_{\rm CDW}$, reaching a peak value of 90 at $T^* = 20$ K. Our results strongly indicate that the phase transition at $T^*$ is not nematic in nature and the previously reported diverging elastoresistivity is due to the contamination from the $A_{1g}$ channel.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CsV3Sb5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers