Mitigation of interfacial dielectric loss in aluminum-on-silicon superconducting qubits
Janka Biznárová, Amr Osman, Emil Rehnman, Lert Chayanun, Christian Križan, Per Malmberg, Marcus Rommel, Christopher Warren, Per Delsing, August Yurgens, Jonas Bylander, Anita Fadavi Roudsari
arXiv:2310.06797 · DOI 10.1038/s41534-024-00868-z · 2023-10-10 · npj Quantum Information
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We demonstrate aluminum-on-silicon planar transmon qubits with time-averaged ${T_1}$ energy relaxation times of up to ${270\,μs}$, corresponding to Q = 5 million, and a highest observed value of ${501\,μs}$. We use materials analysis techniques and numerical simulations to investigate the dominant sources of energy loss, and devise and demonstrate a strategy towards mitigating them. The mitigation of loss is achieved by reducing the presence of oxide, a known host of defects, near the substrate-metal interface, by growing aluminum films thicker than 300 nm. A loss analysis of coplanar-waveguide resonators shows that the improvement is owing to a reduction of dielectric loss due to two-level system defects. We perform time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and observe a reduced presence of oxygen at the substrate-metal interface for the thicker films. The correlation between the enhanced performance and the film thickness is due to the tendency of aluminum to grow in columnar structures of parallel grain boundaries, where the size of the grain depends on the film thickness: transmission electron microscopy imaging shows that the thicker film has larger grains and consequently fewer grain boundaries containing oxide near this interface. These conclusions are supported by numerical simulations of the different loss contributions in the device.
Similar papers
Intermodulation spectroscopy and the nonlinear response of two-level systems in superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators
similarity 0.93Janka Biznárová et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.10775
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic and superconducting phase diagram of Eu(FeNi)As
similarity 0.93Ya-Bin Liu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.09855
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of the pseudogap temperature dependence in YBaCuO films under the influence of a magnetic field
similarity 0.92E. V. Petrenko et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.01413
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong-coupling quantum thermodynamics using a superconducting flux qubit
similarity 0.92Rishabh Upadhyay et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.10774
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scalability of non-adiabatic effects in lithium-decorated graphene superconductor
similarity 0.92Dominik Szczȩśniak · 2023 · arXiv:2301.13697
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive Qubit Readout with Intrinsic Resonator Reset
similarity 0.92M. Jerger et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.04891
Source status unknown — claims are unverified