Flux trapping in hydrides not yet confirmed
N. Zen
arXiv:2310.06869 · 2023-10-07
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In Ref. [1], Minkov et al reported the time dependence of magnetic moment of hydride materials under high pressure in a diamond anvil cell. Here we point out that the straight lines interpolated with the measurement results give the misleading impression that thermal flux creep in superconductors decays linearly with time. To dispel this misconception, we correctly interpolated logarithmic decay curves. Then, it has become apparent that there is no reason to assume that the measured magnetic moment originates from flux trapping, i.e., there is no reason to believe that persistent currents are circulating in hydride materials under high pressure and that they are superconductors.
Similar papers
Flux trapping in superconducting hydrides under high pressure
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2021 · arXiv:2104.03925
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
is a high- superconductor with columnar pinning defects
similarity 0.88Miodrag L. Kulić · 2023 · arXiv:2301.13153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-trapping experiments on ultra-high pressure hydrides as evidence of superconductivity
similarity 0.88Jeffery L. Tallon · 2024 · arXiv:2409.12351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner effect in nonstandard superconductors
similarity 0.86J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2021 · arXiv:2101.01701
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence against superconductivity in flux trapping experiments on hydrides under high pressure & On magnetic field screening and expulsion in hydride superconductors
similarity 0.86J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2022 · arXiv:2207.01541
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic flux penetration and motion in antiferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.86Tomasz Krzyszton · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0209526
Source status unknown — claims are unverified