Pseudogap formation in organic superconductors
Shusaku Imajo, Takuya Kobayashi, Yuki Matsumura, Taiki Maeda, Yasuhiro Nakazawa, Hiromi Taniguchi, Koichi Kindo
arXiv:2312.04034 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.124803 · 2023-12-07 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The condensation of paired fermions into superfluid states changes progressively depending on the coupling strength. At the midpoint of the crossover between Bardeen--Cooper--Schrieffer (BCS) weak-coupling and Bose--Einstein condensate (BEC) strong-coupling limits, paired fermions condensate most robustly, thereby leading to the emergence of a pseudogap due to enhanced pairing fluctuations. In the case of electrons in solids, excessively strong interactions often induce competing electronic orders instead of strong-coupling superconductivity, and experimental comprehension of the pseudogap remains incomplete. In this study, we provide experimental evidence demonstrating the opening of a pseudogap, marking the incipient stage of the BCS-BEC crossover in the organic system $κ$-(BEDT-TTF)$_2$$X$. By controlling electron correlations, we investigate the thermodynamic properties of the BCS-BEC crossover and pseudogap phase. Since the superconductivity of $κ$-(BEDT-TTF)$_2$$X$ arises from a simple Fermi liquid that does not exhibit any other electronic orders, our study shed light on the inherent nature of the BCS-BEC crossover.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (C10H8S8)2I3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| (C10H8S8)2I3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H8S8)2I3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H8S8)2Ag(CN)2H2O Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| (C10H8S8)2Ag(CN)2H2O Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H8S8)2Ag(CN)2H2O Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H8S8)2Cu(NCS)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| (C10H8S8)2Cu(NCS)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H8S8)2Cu(NCS)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H8S8)2Cu(C2N3)Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11.9 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| (C10H8S8)2Cu(C2N3)Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H8S8)2Cu(C2N3)Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H2D6S8)2Cu(C2N3)Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | onset |
| (C10H2D6S8)2Cu(C2N3)Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (C10H2D6S8)2Cu(C2N3)Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pseudogap formation in organic superconductors
similarity 0.93Shusaku Imajo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap regime of the unitary Fermi gas with lattice auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo in the continuum limit
similarity 0.92S. Jensen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.16676
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specific heat and effects of pairing fluctuations in the BCS-BEC crossover regime of an ultracold Fermi gas
similarity 0.91Pieter van Wyk et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.07232
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of Disorder on the Superconducting Properties and BCS-BEC Crossover in FeSe Single Crystals
similarity 0.91Jianping Fu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.09976
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic and Electronic Phase Diagram and Superconductivity in the Organic Superconductors k-(BEDT-TTF)2X
similarity 0.90T. Sasaki et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0108456
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exotic Superconducting States in FeSe-based Materials
similarity 0.90Takasada Shibauchi et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.07315
Source status unknown — claims are unverified