Superfluid stiffness within Eliashberg theory: the role of vertex corrections
Zachary M. Raines, Shang-Shun Zhang, Andrey V. Chubukov
arXiv:2312.13392 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.109.144505 · 2023-12-20 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this work we consider the superfluid stiffness of a generically non-Galilean invariant interacting system and investigate under what conditions the stiffness may nonetheless approach the Galilean-invariant value $n/m$. Within Eliashberg theory we find that the renormalized stiffness is approximately given by $n/m$ in the case when the $l=0$ and $l=1$ components of the effective Fermi-surface projected interaction are approximately equal over a range of frequencies. This holds, in particular, when the interaction is peaked at zero momentum transfer. We examine this result through three complementary lenses: the $δ(ω)$ term in the conductivity, the phase dependence of the Luttinger-Ward free energy, and the coupling of the amplitude and phase sectors in the Hubbard-Stratonovich collective mode action. From these considerations we show that the value of the stiffness is determined by the strength of renormalization of the current vertex and that the latter can be interpreted as the shift of the self-consistent solution due to flow of the condensate, or alternatively as coupling of the phase mode to $l=1$ fluctuations of the order parameter. We highlight that even though the superfluid stiffness in some non-Galilean systems approaches the Galilean value, this is not enforced by symmetry, and in general the stiffness may be strongly suppressed from its BCS value. As a corollary we obtain the generic form of the phase action within Eliashberg theory and charge and spin Ward identities for a superconductor with frequency dependent gap function.
Similar papers
Revisiting the homogeneous electron gas in pursuit of the properly normed ab initio Eliashberg theory
similarity 0.89Ryosuke Akashi · 2021 · arXiv:2106.05751
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-fluctuation interaction in a non-Fermi superconductor
similarity 0.89M. Crisan et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9809152
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent temperature dependence of quasiparticle bands in monolayer FeSe on SrTiO
similarity 0.89Fabian Schrodi et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.12494
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid Stiffness Bounds in Time-Reversal Symmetric Superconductors
similarity 0.89Yongxin Zeng & Andrew J. Millis
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid stiffness of twisted multilayer graphene superconductors
similarity 0.89Abhishek Banerjee et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.13742
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid Fermi gas in a 1D optical lattice
similarity 0.89G. Orso & G. V. Shlyapnikov · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507597
Source status unknown — claims are unverified