Geometric inhibition of superflow in single-layer graphene suggests a staggered-flux superconductivity in bilayer and trilayer graphene
Xinyao Zhang, Ruoshi Jiang, Xingchen Shen, Xiaomo Huang, Qing-Dong Jiang, Wei Ku
arXiv:2401.04106 · DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01390 · 2024-01-08 · Nano letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In great contrast to the numerous discoveries of superconductivity in layer-stacked graphene systems, the absence of superconductivity in the simplest and cleanest monolayer graphene remains a big puzzle. Here, through realistic computation of electronic structure, we identify a systematic trend that superconductivity appears to emerge only upon alteration of the low-energy electronic lattice from the underlying honeycomb atomic structure. We then demonstrate that this inhibition can result from from geometric frustration of the bond lattice that disables quantum phase coherence of the order parameter residing on it. In comparison, upon deviating from the honeycomb lattice, relief of geometric frustration allows robust superfluidity with non-trivial spatial structure. For the specific examples of bilayer and trilayer graphene under an external electric field, such bond centered order parameter would develop superfluidity with staggered flux that breaks the time-reversal symmetry. Our study also suggests the possible realization of the long-sought superconductivity in single-layer graphene via the application of uni-directional strain.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| WSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| WTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Intravalley spin-polarized superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene
similarity 0.89Yang-Zhi Chou et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.06701
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mottness induced superfluid phase fluctuation with increased density
similarity 0.89Zi-Jian Lang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.11206
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Twist-Programmable Superconductivity in Spin-Orbit Coupled Bilayer Graphene
similarity 0.89Yiran Zhang et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.10335
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-dimensional superconductors with intrinsic p-wave pairing or nontrivial band topology
similarity 0.88Wei Qin et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.11652
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity from repulsive interactions in Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene
similarity 0.88Glenn Wagner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Kohn-Luttinger like superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene at large twist angles
similarity 0.87A. O. Sboychakov · 2026 · arXiv:2606.23308
Source status unknown — claims are unverified