Unveiling a Novel Metal-to-Metal Transition in LuH2: Critically Challenging Superconductivity Claims in Lutetium Hydrides
Dong Wang, Ningning Wang, Caoshun Zhang, Chunsheng Xia, Weicheng Guo, Xia Yin, Kejun Bu, Takeshi Nakagawa, Jianbo Zhang, Federico Gorelli, Philip Dalladay-Simpson, Thomas Meier, Xujie Lü, Liling Sun, Jinguang Cheng, Qiaoshi Zeng, Yang Ding, Ho-kwang Mao
arXiv:2401.13958 · DOI 10.1063/5.0183701 · 2024-01-25
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Following the recent report by Dasenbrock-Gammon et al. (2023) of near-ambient superconductivity in nitrogen-doped lutetium trihydride (LuH3-δNε), significant debate has emerged surrounding the composition and interpretation of the observed sharp resistance drop. Here, we meticulously revisit these claims through comprehensive characterization and investigations. We definitively identify the reported material as lutetium dihydride (LuH2), resolving the ambiguity surrounding its composition. Under similar conditions (270-295 K and 1-2 GPa), we replicate the reported sharp decrease in electrical resistance with a 30% success rate, aligning with Dasenbrock-Gammon et al.'s observations. However, our extensive investigations reveal this phenomenon to be a novel, pressure-induced metal-to-metal transition intrinsic to LuH2, distinct from superconductivity. Intriguingly, nitrogen doping exerts minimal impact on this transition. Our work not only elucidates the fundamental properties of LuH2 and LuH3 but also critically challenges the notion of superconductivity in these lutetium hydride systems. These findings pave the way for future research on lutetium hydride systems while emphasizing the crucial importance of rigorous verification in claims of ambient temperature superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LuH3-δNε Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 282.5 | 1.5 GPa | onset |
Similar papers
The near room-temperature upsurge of electrical resistivity in Lu-H-N is not superconductivity, but a metal-to-poor-conductor transition
similarity 0.93Peng, Di et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.00201
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
True superconductivity at near ambient temperature has not been confirmed by Dasenbrock-Gammon, et. al. Nature (2023)
similarity 0.90Sridhar, Srinivas · 2023 · arXiv:2303.05987
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Leading components and pressure-induced color changes in N-doped lutetium hydride
similarity 0.90Xiangru Tao et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.08992
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
No evidence of superconductivity in the compressed sample prepared from the lutetium foil and H2/N2 gas mixture
similarity 0.89Shu Cai et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.03100
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of Flat Band and Van Hove Singularity in Non-superconducting Nitrogen-doped Lutetium Hydride
similarity 0.89Liang, Xin et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.16420
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robust magnetism against pressure in non-superconducting samples prepared from lutetium foil and H2/N2 gas mixture
similarity 0.89Guo, Jing et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.04302
Source status unknown — claims are unverified