← Back to search

On the origin of topotactic reduction effect for superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates

Shengwei Zeng, Chi Sin Tang, Zhaoyang Luo, Lin Er Chow, Zhi Shiuh Lim, Saurav Prakash, Ping Yang, Caozheng Diao, Xiaojiang Yu, Zhenxiang Xing, Rong Ji, Xinmao Yin, Changjian Li, X. Renshaw Wang, Qian He, Mark B. H. Breese, A. Ariando, Huajun Liu

arXiv:2403.00960 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.066503 · 2024-03-01

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Topotactic reduction utilizing metal hydrides as reagents emerges as an effective approach to achieve exceptionally low oxidization states of metal ions and unconventional coordination networks. This method opens avenues to the development of entirely new functional materials, with one notable example being the infinite-layer nickelate superconductors. However, the reduction effect on the atomic reconstruction and electronic structures -- crucial for superconductivity -- remains largely unresolved. We design two sets of control Nd$_{0.8}$Sr$_{0.2}$NiO$_2$ thin films and implement secondary ion mass spectroscopy to highlight the absence of reduction-induced hydrogen intercalation. X-ray absorption spectroscopy shows a significant linear dichroism with dominant Ni 3d$_{x2{-}y2}$ orbitals on superconducting samples, indicating a Ni single-band nature of infinite-layer nickelates. Consistent with the superconducting $T_c$, the Ni 3d orbitals asymmetry manifests a dome-like reduction duration dependence. Our results unveil the critical role of reduction in modulating the Ni-3d orbital polarization and its impact on the superconducting properties.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers