← Back to search

Quantum Stabilization and Flat Hydrogen-based Bands of Nitrogen-doped Lutetium Hydride

Adam Denchfield, Francesco Belli, Eva Zurek, Hyowon Park, Russell J Hemley

arXiv:2403.01350 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.110.174110 · 2024-03-03 · Physical Review B

T1experimental4 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We explore electronic and structural properties of Fm$\overline{3}$m Lu-H-N structures with specific N,H ordering as plausible candidates for near-ambient superconductivity possibly originating from their remarkably narrow hydrogen-based bands at the Fermi level. Although LuH$_{2.875}$N$_{0.125}$ exhibits an instability persisting up to 17 GPa, it is anharmonically stable near ambient pressure when accounting for quantum nuclear effects. The presence of flat bands near $E_\text{F}$ is understood to arise from destructive\ quantum interference between N-p and surrounding H-s orbitals, with certain types of defects leaving the flat bands unaffected. The results suggest there is an optimal pressure near ambient where the superconducting $T_{\text{c}}$ is maximized in this structure by anharmonically-stabilized low-frequency and non-adiabatically coupled high-frequency hydrogen modes. Despite the metastability of this structure, its electronic properties and dynamical stability when calculated beyond a classical harmonic approach can explain the reported near-ambient superconductivity in Lu-H-N.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LuH2.75N0.25

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

100Pressure not reportedunknown
LuH2.875N0.125

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

182.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers