Case studies on time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations for superconducting applications
Cun Xue, Qing-Yu Wang, Han-Xi Ren, An He, A. V. Silhanek
arXiv:2403.03729 · DOI 10.23919/emsci.2024.0012 · 2024-03-06 · Electromagnetic Science
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The macroscopic electromagnetic properties of type II superconductors are primarily influenced by the behavior of microscopic superconducting flux quantum units. Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) equations provide an elegant and powerful tool for describing and examining both the statics and dynamics of these superconducting entities. They have been instrumental in replicating and elucidating numerous experimental results over the past decades.This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the progress in TDGL simulations, focusing on three key aspects of superconductor applications. The initial section delves into vortex rectification in superconductors described within the TDGL framework. We specifically highlight the superconducting diode effect achieved through asymmetric pinning landscapes and the reversible manipulation of vortex ratchets with dynamic pinning landscapes. The subsequent section reviews the achievements of TDGL simulations concerning the critical current density of superconductors, emphasizing the optimization of pinning sites, particularly vortex pinning and dynamics in polycrystalline Nb$_3$Sn with grain boundaries. The third part concentrates on numerical modeling of vortex penetration and dynamics in superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities, including a discussion of superconductor insulator superconductor multilayer structures. In the last section, we present key findings, insights, and perspectives derived from the discussed simulations.
Similar papers
Rectification of Vortex Motion in a Circular Ratchet Channel
similarity 0.92N. S. Lin et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1107.5599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chirped pulse control over the melting of superconductors
similarity 0.90Maria Recasens et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.04538
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In silico optimization of critical currents in superconductors
similarity 0.90Gregory Kimmel et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.10822
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of hexagonal patterned arrays and defect geometry on the critical current of superconducting films
similarity 0.90I. A. Sadovskyy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic pair-breaking current, critical superfluid velocity and nonlinear electromagnetic response of nonequilibrium superconductors
similarity 0.90Ahmad Sheikhzada & Alex Gurevich · 2020 · arXiv:2008.12732
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nucleation and Arrangement of Abrikosov Vortices in Hybrid Superconductor-Ferromagnetic Nanostructure
similarity 0.89Sara Memarzadeh et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.12486
Source status unknown — claims are unverified