Superconductivity in the Fibonacci Chain
Ying Wang, Gautam Rai, Chris Matsumura, Anuradha Jagannathan, Stephan Haas
arXiv:2403.06157 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.109.214507 · 2024-03-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity was recently reported in several quasicrystalline systems. These are materials which are structurally ordered, but since they are not translationally invariant, the usual BCS theory does not apply. At the present time, the underlying mechanism and the properties of the superconducting phase are insufficiently understood. To gain a better understanding of quasiperiodic superconductors, we consider the attractive Hubbard model on the Fibonacci chain, and examine its low-temperature superconducting phase in detail using the Bogoliubov-de Gennes mean-field approach. We obtain superconducting solutions as a function of the parameters controlling the physical properties of the system: the strength of the Hubbard attraction $U$, the chemical potential $μ$, and the strength of the modulation of the Fibonacci Hamiltonian, $w$. We find that there is a bulk transition at a critical temperature that obeys a power law in $U$. The local superconducting order parameter is self-similar both in real and perpendicular space. The local densities of states vary from site to site, however, the width of the superconducting gap is the same on all sites. The interplay between the Hubbard attraction and the intrinsic gaps of the Fibonacci chain results in a complex zero-temperature $μ$-$U$ phase diagram with insulating domes surrounded by superconducting regions. Finally, we show that tuning $w$ from weak to strong quasicrystalline modulation gives rise to qualitatively different thermodynamic behaviors as could be observed by measuring the specific heat.
Similar papers
Edge and corner superconductivity in a 2D topological model
similarity 0.97Ying Wang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.12059
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal crossover in surface superconductivity: Impact of varying Debye energy
similarity 0.92Quanyong Zhu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.22636
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exploring the Effect of the Number of Hydrogen Atoms on the Properties of Lanthanide Hydrides by DMFT
similarity 0.90Yao Wei et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.11773
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Secondary Collective Excitations in Intermediate to Strong-Coupling Superconductors
similarity 0.90Joshua Althüser & Götz S. Uhrig · 2026 · arXiv:2605.20059
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BdG equations within lattice Hubbard model for the description of -states in nanoscale S-FF-S junctions
similarity 0.89N. Stefanakis · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310271
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital Limit and Gaussian Fluctuation Effects in Flat Band Superconductors with PseudoMagnetic Fields
similarity 0.89Xiao-Hui Li & Yao Lu · 2018 · arXiv:1806.03480
Source status unknown — claims are unverified