Unraveling p-type and n-type interfaces in Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelate thin films
Aravind Raji, Araceli Gutiérrez-Llorente, Dongxin Zhang, Xiaoyan Li, Manuel Bibes, Lucia Iglesias, Jean-Pascal Rueff, Alexandre Gloter
arXiv:2405.02186 · DOI 10.1002/adfm.202409930 · 2024-05-03 · Advanced Functional Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
After decades of research, superconductivity was finally found in nickel-based analogs of superconducting cuprates, with infinite-layer (IL) structure. These results are so far restricted to thin films in the case of IL-nickelates. Therefore, the nature of the interface with the substrate, and how it couples with the thin film properties is still an open question. Here, using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)- electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and four-dimensional (4D)-STEM, a novel chemically sharp p-type interface is observed in a series of superconducting IL-praseodymium nickelate samples, and a comparative study is carried out with the previously reported n-type interface obtained in other samples. Both interfaces have strong differences, with the p-type interface being highly polar. In combination with ab-initio calculations, we find that the influence of the interface on the electronic structure is local, and does not extend beyond 2-3 unit cells into the thin film. This decouples the direct influence of the interface in driving the superconductivity, and indicates that the IL-nickelate thin films do not have a universal interface model. Insights into the spatial hole-distribution in SC samples, provided by monochromated EELS and total reflection-hard x-ray photoemission spectroscopy, suggest that this particular distribution might be directly influencing superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| PrNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PrNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Visualisation of quantised vortex reconnection as enabled by laser ablation
similarity 0.96Yosuke Minowa et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.04826
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct excitation of Kelvin waves on quantized vortices
similarity 0.96Yosuke Minowa et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.16411
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of Josephson Harmonics in Tunnel Junctions
similarity 0.95Dennis Willsch et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.09192
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Feedback of non-local nematicity on the magnetic anisotropy in FeSe
similarity 0.95Steffen Bötzel & Ilya M. Eremin · 2022 · arXiv:2205.07718
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for chiral supercurrent in quantum Hall Josephson junctions
similarity 0.94Hadrien Vignaud et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.01766
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revealing the frequency-dependent oscillations in the nonlinear terahertz response induced by the Josephson current
similarity 0.94Sijie Zhang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.13858
Source status unknown — claims are unverified