Reply to "Comment on `Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure' "
J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio
arXiv:2405.08823 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.186502 · 2024-05-11 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In Ref. [1] we surveyed the known hydride superconductors, and compared their resistive behavior to that of typical known superconductors, including conventional (e.g. NbN and MgB$_2$) and unconventional (e.g. YBCO) superconductors, and concluded that the behavior of the hydrides was indicative of nonstandard or no superconductivity. In the preceding comment, Talantsev, Minkov, Balakirev and Eremets [2] (arXiv:2311.07865) claim that we presented a "flawed analysis and a selective and inaccurate report of published data." Here we show that this claim is wrong.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NaFe1-xCoxAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| H3S Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YH6 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SnH4 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La4H23 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Flux trapping in superconducting hydrides under high pressure
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2021 · arXiv:2104.03925
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to “Comment on ‘Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure”'
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to "Is a superconductor? Comment on "Evidence Against Superconductivity in Flux Trapping Experiments on Hydrides Under High Pressure" "
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2024 · arXiv:2412.05291
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On magnetic field screening and trapping in hydrogen-rich high-temperature superconductors: unpulling the wool over readers' eyes
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2023 · arXiv:2309.02683
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intrinsic hysteresis in the presumed superconducting transition of hydrides under high pressure
similarity 0.87J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2021 · arXiv:2101.07208
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on arXiv:2312.04495 by M. I. Eremets and coauthors
similarity 0.87J. E. Hirsch · 2024 · arXiv:2401.08927
Source status unknown — claims are unverified