Superconducting spin valve effect in the Co/Pb/Co heterostructure with insulating interlayers
A. A. Kamashev, N. N. Garif'yanov, A. A. Validov, V. Kataev, A. S. Osin, Ya. V. Fominov, I. A. Garifullin
arXiv:2405.10838 · DOI 10.3762/bjnano.15.41 · 2024-05-17 · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the superconducting properties of the Co/Pb/Co heterostructures with thin insulating interlayers. The main specific feature of these structures is the intentional oxidation of both superconductor/ferromagnet (S/F) interfaces. We study variation of the critical temperature of our systems due to switching between parallel and antiparallel configurations of the magnetizations of the two magnetic layers. Common wisdom suggests that this spin valve effect, which is due to the S/F proximity effect, is most pronounced in the case of perfect metallic contact at the interfaces. Nevertheless, in our structures with intentionally deteriorated interfaces, we observed a significant full spin valve effect. A shift of the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ by switching the mutual orientation of the magnetizations of the two ferromagnetic Co layers from antiparallel to parallel amounted to $ΔT_c =0.2$ K at the optimal thickness of the superconducting Pb layer. Our finding verifies the so far unconfirmed earlier results by Deutscher and Meunier on an F1/S/F2 heterostructure with oxidized interlayers [https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.395, G. Deutscher and F. Meunier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 395 (1969)] and suggests an alternative route to optimize the performance of the superconducting spin valves.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Gate-Tunable Superconducting Spin Valve in a van der Waals Ferromagnet/Superconductor/Ferromagnet Trilayer
similarity 0.90A. S. Ianovskaia et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2512.09093
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Expanding the operational temperature window of a superconducting spin valve
similarity 0.90A. A. Kamashev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting spin valves based on a single spiral magnetic layer
similarity 0.90N. G. Pugach et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.00369
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting spin valves based on antiferromagnet/superconductor/antiferromagnet heterostructures
similarity 0.90G. A. Bobkov et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.16935
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudo spin-valve switch based on ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet trilayer microbridge
similarity 0.90L. N. Karelina et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2009.00498
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Manifestation of triplet superconductivity in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
similarity 0.90F. S. Bergeret et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0303548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified