Non-Invasive Readout of the Kinetic Inductance of Superconducting Nanostructures
Lukas Nulens, Davi A. D. Chaves, Omar J. Y. Harb, Jeroen E. Scheerder, Nicolas Lejeune, Kamal Brahim, Bart Raes, Alejandro V. Silhanek, Margriet J. Van Bael, Joris Van de Vondel
arXiv:2405.11882 · DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01039 · 2024-05-20 · Nano letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The energy landscape of multiply connected superconducting structures is ruled by fluxoid quantization due to the implied single-valuedness of the complex wave function. The transitions and interaction between these energy states, each defined by a specific phase winding number, are governed by classical and/or quantum phase slips. Understanding these events requires the ability to probe, non-invasively, the state of the ring. Here, we employ a niobium resonator to examine the superconducting properties of an aluminum loop. By applying a magnetic field, adjusting temperature, and altering the loop's dimensions via focused ion beam milling, we correlate resonance frequency shifts with changes in the loop's kinetic inductance. This parameter is a unique indicator of the superconducting condensate's state, facilitating the detection of phase slips in nanodevices and providing insights into their dynamics. Our method presents a proof-of-principle spectroscopic technique with promising potential for investigating the Cooper pair density in inductively coupled superconducting nanostructures.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.23 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| InOx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Stability of thermally bistable states and their switching in superconducting weak link
similarity 0.95Sourav Biswas et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.04538
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parametric exploration of zero-energy modes in three-terminal InSb-Al nanowire devices
similarity 0.95Ji-Yin Wang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.00773
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Three-Wave Mixing Quantum-Limited Kinetic Inductance Parametric Amplifier operating at 6 Tesla and near 1 Kelvin
similarity 0.94Simone Frasca et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.00748
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent parity-meter in a nanowire Cooper-pair transistor
similarity 0.94Ji-Yin Wang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.08466
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong tunable coupling between two distant superconducting spin qubits
similarity 0.93Marta Pita-Vidal et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.15654
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optimizing the growth conditions of Al mirrors for superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors
similarity 0.93R. Flaschmann et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.17980
Source status unknown — claims are unverified