Magic angle of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$: Optimizing correlation-driven superconductivity
Jonas B. Profe, Luke C. Rhodes, Matteo Dürrnagel, Rebecca Bisset, Carolina A. Marques, Shun Chi, Tilman Schwemmer, Ronny Thomale, Dante M. Kennes, Chris Hooley, Peter Wahl
arXiv:2405.14926 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043057 · 2024-05-23
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Understanding of unconventional superconductivity is crucial for engineering materials with specific order parameters or elevated superconducting transition temperatures. However, for many materials, the pairing mechanism and symmetry of the order parameter remain unclear: reliable and efficient methods of predicting the order parameter and its response to tuning parameters are lacking. Here, we investigate the response of superconductivity in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ to structural distortions via the random phase approximation (RPA) and functional renormalization group (FRG), starting from realistic models of the electronic structure. Our results suggest that RPA misses the interplay of competing fluctuation channels. FRG reproduces key experimental findings. We predict a magic octahedral rotation angle, maximizing the superconducting $T_c$ and a dominant $d_{x^2-y^2}$ pairing symmetry. To enable experimental verification, we provide calculations of the phase-referenced Bogoliubov Quasiparticle Interference imaging. Our work demonstrates a designer approach to tuning unconventional superconductivity with relevance and applicability for a wide range of quantum materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magic angle of Sr2RuO4: Optimizing correlation-driven superconductivity
similarity 1.00Jonas B. Profe et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying the pairing symmetry in the Sr2RuO4 superconductor
similarity 0.88Matthias J. Graf & A. V. Balatsky
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Perturbation theory analysis of the strain-dependent superconducting phase diagram for SrRuO
similarity 0.88John Deisz · 2023 · arXiv:2308.14892
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Perturbation theory analysis of the strain-dependent superconducting phase diagram for Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.88J. J. Deisz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional superconductivity and magnetism in SrRuO and related materials
similarity 0.87I. Eremin et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401064
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conditions for orbital-selective altermagnetism in Sr2RuO4: Tight-binding model, similarities with cuprates, and implications for superconductivity
similarity 0.87Carmine Autieri et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified