Sub-symmetry Protected Topology in Topological Insulators and Superconductors
Myungjun Kang, Mingyu Lee, Sangmo Cheon
arXiv:2406.01089 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033323 · 2024-06-03 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Exploration of topology protected by a certain symmetry is central in condensed matter physics. A recent idea of sub-symmetry-protected (SSP) topology--remains of a broken symmetry can still protect specific topological boundary states--has been developed and demonstrated in an optical system [Nat. Phys. 19, 992-998 (2023)]. Here, we extend this idea further by applying sub-symmetry-protecting perturbation (SSPP) to one-dimensional topological insulating and superconducting systems using the Su-Schrieffer-Hegger (SSH) and Kitaev models. Using the tight-binding and low-energy effective theory, we show that the SSP boundary states retain topological properties while the SSPP results in the asymmetry of boundary states. For the SSH model, an SSP zero-energy edge state localized on one edge possesses quantized polarization. In contrast, the other edge state is perturbed to have non-zero energy, and its polarization is not quantized. For topological superconductors, zero-energy SSP Majorana boundary states for spinful Kitaev models emerge on only one edge, contrary to the conventional belief that Majorana fermions emerge at opposite edges. Our findings can be used as a platform to expand our understanding of topological materials as they broaden our understanding of the symmetry in a topological system and a method to engineer Majorana fermions.
Similar papers
Ground states of atomic Fermi gases in a two-dimensional optical lattice with and without population imbalance
similarity 0.94Lin Sun & Qijin Chen · 2022 · arXiv:2205.04045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Implementing Josephson Junction spectroscopy in a scanning tunneling microscope
similarity 0.93Margaret A. Fortman et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.03009
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Subsymmetry protected topology in topological insulators and superconductors
similarity 0.92Myungjun Kang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultrastrong tunable coupler between superconducting LC resonators
similarity 0.92Takafumi Miyanaga et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.13175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing symmetries of multiple superconducting phases in UTe2: Competition between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic fluctuations
similarity 0.92Jushin Tei et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.04629
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elastic properties of Cu-6wt\%Ag alloy wires for pulsed magnets investigated by ultrasonic techniques
similarity 0.91Ziyu Li et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.09376
Source status unknown — claims are unverified