On the trapped magnetic moment in type-II superconductors
Ruslan Prozorov
arXiv:2406.13102 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ad86f0 · 2024-06-18 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Measurements of the trapped (remanent) magnetic moment, $M_{trap}\left(H\right)$, when a small magnetic field $H$ is turned off after cooling below the superconducting transition temperature, $T_c$, or ramping a magnetic field up and down after cooling in a zero field, have advantages in difficult cases of small samples and large field-dependent backgrounds, which is relevant for hydrogen-based ultra-high-$T_{c}$ superconductors (UHTS). Until recently, there was no need for a separate paper on the trapped magnetic flux for well-known critical state models due to the simplicity of the physics involved. However, recent publications showed the need for such an analysis. This note summarizes the expectations for the Bean model with constant critical current density and the Kim model with field-dependent critical currents. It is shown that if the trapped moment is fitted to the power law, $M_{trap}\propto H^α$, the fixed exponent $α=2$ is exact for the Bean model, while Kim models show a wide interval of possible values, $2\leqα\leq4$. Furthermore, accounting for reversible magnetization expands the range of possible exponents to $1\leqα\leq4$. In addition, demagnetizing factors are essential and make the trapped moment orientation dependent even in isotropic materials. As a concrete application, it is shown that flux trapping experiments on H$_{3}$S UHTS compounds can be described well using this generalized approach, lending further support to the type-II superconducting nature of H$_{3}$S under ultra-high pressure.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CaKFe4As4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Bean’s, Kim’s, and exponential critical-state models for high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.88D.-X. Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence against superconductivity in flux trapping experiments on hydrides under high pressure & On magnetic field screening and expulsion in hydride superconductors
similarity 0.87J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2022 · arXiv:2207.01541
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
General critical states in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.86A. Badía-Majós et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0909.2311
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging the Meissner effect and flux trapping in a hydride superconductor at megabar pressures using a nanoscale quantum sensor
similarity 0.86Prabudhya Bhattacharyya et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.03122
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Bean model of the critical state in a magnetically shielded superconductor filament
similarity 0.86S. V. Yampolskii et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.1326
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electric field formulation for thin film magnetization problems
similarity 0.86John W Barrett & Leonid Prigozhin · 2012 · arXiv:1204.1609
Source status unknown — claims are unverified