High-Tc superconductor candidates proposed by machine learning
Siwoo Lee, Jason Hattrick-Simpers, Young-June Kim, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld
arXiv:2406.14524 · 2024-06-20
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We cast the relation between the chemical composition of a solid-state material and its superconducting critical temperature (Tc) as a statistical learning problem with reduced complexity. Training of query-aware similarity-based ridge regression models on experimental SuperCon data achieve average Tc prediction errors of ~5 K for unseen out-of-sample materials. Two models were trained with one excluding high pressure data in training ("ambient" model) and a second also including high pressure data ("implicit" model). Subsequent utilization of the approach to scan ~153k materials in the Materials Project enables the ranking of candidates by Tc while accounting for thermodynamic stability and small band gap. The ambient model is used to predict stable top three high-Tc candidate materials that include those with large band gaps of LiCuF4 (316 K), Ag2H12S(NO)4 (316 K), and Na2H6PtO6 (315 K). Filtering these candidates for those with small band gaps correspondingly yields LiCuF4 (316 K), Cu2P2O7 (311 K), and Cu3P2H2O9 (307 K).
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiCuF4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 316 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Ag2H12S(NO)4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 316 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Na2H6PtO6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 315 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Cu2P2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 311 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Cu3P2H2O9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 307 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperature
similarity 0.90Valentin Stanev et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Predicting new superconductors and their critical temperatures using unsupervised machine learning
similarity 0.90B. Roter & S. V. Dordevic · 2020 · arXiv:2002.07266
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine-Learning-Guided Prediction Models of Critical Temperature of Cuprates
similarity 0.90Donggun Lee et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.02810
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Investigation on Machine Learning Based Approaches for Estimating the Critical Temperature of Superconductors
similarity 0.89Fatin Abrar Shams et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.01932
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine learning accelerated search for superconductors in B-C-N based compounds and R3Ni2O7-type nickelates
similarity 0.89Xiaoying Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of superconducting properties of materials based on machine learning models
similarity 0.89Jie Hu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.03075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified