← Back to search

Single-gap Isotropic $s-$wave Superconductivity in Single Crystals $\text{AuSn}_4$

Sunil Ghimire, Kamal R. Joshi, Elizabeth H. Krenkel, Makariy A. Tanatar, Marcin Konczykowski, Romain Grasset, Paul C. Canfield, Ruslan Prozorov

arXiv:2407.03587 · DOI 10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.4.116 · 2024-07-04 · SciPost Physics

T1experimental

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

London, $λ_L (T)$, and Campbell, $λ_{C} (T)$, penetration depths were measured in single crystals of a topological superconductor candidate $\text{AuSn}_4$. At low temperatures, $λ_L (T)$ is exponentially attenuated and, if fitted with the power law, $λ(T) \sim T^n$, gives exponents $n>4$, indistinguishable from the isotropic single $s-$wave gap Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) asymptotic. The superfluid density fits perfectly in the entire temperature range to the BCS theory. The superconducting transition temperature, $T_c = 2.40 \pm 0.05\:\text{K}$, does not change after 2.5 MeV electron irradiation, indicating the validity of the Anderson theorem for isotropic $s-$wave superconductors. Campbell penetration depth before and after electron irradiation shows no hysteresis between the zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) protocols, consistent with the parabolic pinning potential. Interestingly, the critical current density estimated from the original Campbell theory decreases after irradiation, implying that a more sophisticated theory involving collective effects is needed to describe vortex pinning in this system. In general, our thermodynamic measurements strongly suggest that the bulk response of the $\text{AuSn}_4$ crystals is fully consistent with the isotropic $s-$wave weak-coupling BCS superconductivity.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
AuSn4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.4Pressure not reportedonset
AuSn4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.4Pressure not reportedunknown
AuSn4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reported—
AuSn4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reported—
AuSn4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reported—
AuSn4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reported—

Similar papers