Inferior interfacial superconductivity in 1 UC FeSe/SrVO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$ with screened interfacial electron-phonon coupling
Nan Guo, Xiaoyang Chen, Tianlun Yu, Yu Fan, Qinghua Zhang, Minyinan Lei, Xiaofeng Xu, Xuetao Zhu, Jiandong Guo, Lin Gu, Haichao Xu, Rui Peng, Donglai Feng
arXiv:2407.09880 · DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01612 · 2024-07-13 · Nano letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Monolayer FeSe/TiO$_x$ and FeSe/FeO$_x$ interfaces exhibit significant superconductivity enhancement compared to bulk FeSe, with interfacial electron-phonon coupling (EPC) playing a crucial role. However, the reduced dimensionality in monolayer FeSe, which may drive superconducting fluctuations, complicates the understanding of the enhancement mechanisms. Here we construct a new superconducting interface: monolayer FeSe/SrVO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$, in which the itinerant electrons of highly metallic SrVO$_3$ films can screen all the high-energy Fuchs-Kliewer phonons, including those of SrTiO$_3$, making it the first FeSe/oxide system with screened interfacial EPC while maintaining the monolayer FeSe thickness. Despite comparable doping levels, the heavily electron-doped monolayer FeSe/SrVO$_3$ exhibits a lower pairing temperature ($T_\mathrm{g}$ $\sim$ 48 K) than FeSe/SrTiO$_3$ and FeSe/LaFeO$_3$. Our findings disentangle the contributions of interfacial EPC from dimensionality on enhancing $T_\mathrm{g}$ in FeSe/oxide interfaces, underscoring the importance of interfacial EPC in $T_\mathrm{g}$ enhancement. This FeSe/VO$_x$ interface also provides a platform for studying the interfacial superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 48 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 65 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Ab initio Study of Cross-Interface Electron-Phonon Couplings in FeSe Thin Films on SrTiO and BaTiO
similarity 0.93Yan Wang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1602.03288
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superconductivity in FeSe/SrTiO from the combination of forward scattering phonons and spin fluctuations
similarity 0.92Louk Rademaker et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.08307
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Nematic Fluctuations in a model of FeSe monolayers: A Determinant Quantum Monte Carlo Study
similarity 0.91Philipp T. Dumitrescu et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.08523
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Tc via spin fluctuations from incipient bands: application to monolayers and intercalates of FeSe
similarity 0.91A. Linscheid et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.03739
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of transport properties in FeSe thin flakes with thickness approaching the two-dimensional limit
similarity 0.90C. S. Zhu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.10481
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In-situ topotactic chemical reaction for spectroscopies
similarity 0.90Tappei Kawakami et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.02114
Source status unknown — claims are unverified