← Back to search

Evidence of electron interaction with an unidentified bosonic mode in superconductor CsCa$_2$Fe$_4$As$_4$F$_2$

Peng Li, Sen Liao, Zhicheng Wang, Huaxun Li, Shiwu Su, Jiakang Zhang, Ziyuan Chen, Zhicheng Jiang, Zhengtai Liu, Lexian Yang, Linwei Huai, Junfeng He, Shengtao Cui, Zhe Sun, Yajun Yan, Guanghan Cao, Dawei Shen, Juan Jiang, Donglai Feng

arXiv:2408.00469 · DOI 10.1038/s41467-024-50833-9 · 2024-08-01

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The kink structure in band dispersion usually refers to a certain electron-boson interaction, which is crucial in understanding the pairing in unconventional superconductors. Here we report the evidence of the observation of a kink structure in Fe-based superconductor CsCa$_2$Fe$_4$As$_4$F$_2$ using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. The kink shows an orbital selective and momentum dependent behavior, which is located at 15 meV below Fermi level along the Gamma-M direction at the band with dxz orbital character and vanishes when approaching the Gamma-X direction, correlated with a slight decrease of the superconducting gap. Most importantly, this kink structure disappears when the superconducting gap closes, indicating that the corresponding bosonic mode (9 meV) is closely related to superconductivity. However, the origin of this mode remains unidentified, since it cannot be related to phonons or the spin resonance mode (15 meV) observed by inelastic neutron scattering. The behavior of this mode is rather unique and challenges our present understanding of the superconducting paring mechanism of the bilayer FeAs-based superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CsCa2Fe4As4F2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers