Pairing tendencies in the doped Kitaev-Heisenberg model
Pontus Laurell, Bradraj Pandey, Gábor B. Halász, Satoshi Okamoto, Gonzalo Alvarez, Elbio Dagotto
arXiv:2409.04389 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.224518 · 2024-09-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the impact of hole-doping on the Kitaev-Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice. We investigate the pairing tendencies and correlation functions in the framework of a $t-J-K$ model using density matrix renormalization group calculations on three-leg cylinders. In the case of the pure Kitaev model, which realizes a quantum spin-liquid phase at half-filling, we find that binding of two holes only occurs at low values of the hopping, where the holes are slow. We have theoretically verified that pair formation occurs in the limit of immobile holes, where the pure Kitaev model remains exactly solvable. When we instead fix the hopping at an intermediate, more realistic, value, and vary the Heisenberg and Kitaev interaction strengths, we find pairing tendencies only in the Néel phase. This is in contrast to prior mean-field calculations, highlighting the importance of accounting for the kinetic energy of dopants in generalized Kitaev models. Interestingly, we also find signatures of pair-density wave formation over the studied range of model parameters, namely a periodic modulation of the charge density as well as the spin-spin and pair-pair correlations in real space. Moreover, we present a comparative study of the different correlations as a function of doping. We finally discuss the potential for experimentally observing the studied physics in quantum materials and heterostructures.
Similar papers
LaBaCuO as a superconducting Rosetta Stone
similarity 0.90John M. Tranquada · 2023 · arXiv:2310.15381
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Order Fractionalization in a Kitaev-Kondo model
similarity 0.89Alexei M. Tsvelik & Piers Coleman · 2021 · arXiv:2112.07781
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hole-pair symmetry and excitations in the strong-coupling extended t-J_z model
similarity 0.89R. M. Fye · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9706073
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Generation of spin-triplet Cooper pairs via a canted antiferromagnet
similarity 0.89Simran Chourasia et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.18145
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intertwined states at finite temperatures in the Hubbard model
similarity 0.88E. W. Huang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.09704
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect in superconductor/conical magnet heterostructures
similarity 0.88Daniel Fritsch & James F. Annett · 2014 · arXiv:1409.0366
Source status unknown — claims are unverified