A unified theoretical framework for Kondo superconductors: Periodic Anderson impurities with attractive pairing and Rashba spin-orbit coupling
Shangjian Jin, Darryl C. W. Foo, Tingyu Qu, Barbaros Özyilmaz, Shaffique Adam
arXiv:2409.12494 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.014505 · 2024-09-19 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Magnetic superconductors manifest a fascinating interplay between their magnetic and superconducting properties. This becomes evident, for example, in the significant enhancement of the upper critical field observed in uranium-based superconductors, or the destruction of superconductivity well below the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ in cobalt-doped NbSe$_2$. In this work, we argue that the Kondo interaction plays a pivotal role in governing these behaviors. By employing a periodic Anderson model, we study the Kondo effect in superconductors with either singlet or triplet pairing. In the regime of small impurity energies and high doping concentrations, we find the emergence of a Kondo resistive region below $T_c$. While a magnetic field suppresses singlet superconductivity, it stabilizes triplet pairing through the screening of magnetic impurities, inducing reentrant superconductivity at high fields. Moreover, introducing an antisymmetric spin-orbital coupling suppresses triplet superconductivity. This framework provides a unified picture to understand the observation of Kondo effect in NbSe$_2$ as well as the phase diagrams in Kondo superconductors such as UTe$_2$, and URhGe.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| URhGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UCoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ce1-xLaxRu3Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Odd frequency pairing in a quantum critical metal
similarity 0.91Yi-Ming Wu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.10903
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal conductivity of nonunitary triplet superconductors: application to UTe
similarity 0.91Vivek Mishra et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.05917
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Euler Obstructed Cooper Pairing: Nodal Superconductivity and Hinge Majorana Zero Modes
similarity 0.91Jiabin Yu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.02685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Connection between f-electron correlations and magnetic excitations in UTe2
similarity 0.91Thomas Halloran et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.14619
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlated normal state fermiology and topological superconductivity in UTe2
similarity 0.91Hong Chul Choi et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.04876
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermion dynamical symmetry and strongly-correlated electrons: a comprehensive model of high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.91Mike Guidry et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.07994
Source status unknown — claims are unverified