Reduced Order Hysteretic Magnetization Model for Composite Superconductors
Julien Dular, Arjan Verweij, Mariusz Wozniak
arXiv:2409.13653 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/adb5cc · 2024-09-20 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose the Reduced Order Hysteretic Magnetization (ROHM) model to describe the magnetization and instantaneous power loss of composite superconductors subject to time-varying magnetic fields. Once the parameters of the ROHM model are fixed based on reference simulations, it allows to directly compute the macroscopic response of composite superconductors without the need to solve the detailed current density distribution. It can then be used as part of a homogenization method in large-scale superconducting models to significantly reduce the computational effort compared to detailed simulations. In this contribution, we focus on the case of a strand with twisted superconducting filaments subject to a time-varying transverse magnetic field. We propose two variations of the ROHM model: (i) a rate-independent model that reproduces hysteresis in the filaments, and (ii) a rate-dependent model that generalizes the first level by also reproducing dynamic effects due to coupling and eddy currents. We then describe the implementation and inclusion of the ROHM model in a finite element framework, discuss how to deduce the model parameters, and finally demonstrate the capabilities of the approach in terms of accuracy and efficiency over a wide range of excitation frequencies and amplitudes.
Similar papers
Nematic response revealed by coherent phonon oscillations in BaFeAs
similarity 0.86Min-Cheol Lee et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.04672
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transient superconductivity in three-dimensional Hubbard systems by combining matrix product states and self-consistent mean-field theory
similarity 0.86Svenja Marten et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.09841
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resolving competition of charge-density wave and superconducting phases using the MPS+MF algorithm
similarity 0.86Gunnar Bollmark et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.08116
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magneto-Thermal Thin Shell Approximation for 3D Finite Element Analysis of No-Insulation Coils
similarity 0.86Erik Schnaubelt et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.03138
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fate of poor man's Majoranas in the long Kitaev chain limit
similarity 0.85Melina Luethi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.10030
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of interatomic repulsion on Majorana zero modes in a coupled quantum-dot-superconducting-nanowire hybrid system
similarity 0.85R. Kenyi Takagui Perez & A. A. Aligia · 2023 · arXiv:2309.10888
Source status unknown — claims are unverified