← Back to search

Direct Imaging of Transition-Edge Sensors with Scanning SQUID Microscopy

Samantha Walker, Austin Kaczmarek, Jason Austermann, Douglas Bennett, Shannon M. Duff, Johannes Hubmayr, Ben Keller, Kelsey Morgan, Colin C. Murphy, Daniel Swetz, Joel Ullom, Michael D. Niemack, Katja C. Nowack

arXiv:2410.01940 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2025.3528914 · 2024-10-02 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity

T3experimental1 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Significant advancements have been made in understanding the physics of transition-edge sensors (TESs) over the past decade. However, key questions remain, particularly a detailed understanding of the current-dependent resistance of these detectors when biased within their superconducting transition. We use scanning superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) microscopy (SSM) to image the local diamagnetic response of aluminum-manganese alloy (Al-Mn) transition-edge sensors (TESs) near their critical temperature of approximately 175 mK. By doing so, we gain insights into how the device dimensions influence TES transition width, which in turn affects device operation and informs optimal device design. Our images reveal that the Al-Mn thin film near the niobium (Nb) leads exhibits an excess diamagnetic response at temperatures several milli-Kelvin (mK) higher than the bulk of the film farther from the contacts. A possible origin of this behavior is a longitudinal proximity effect between the Nb and Al-Mn where the TES acts as a weak link between superconducting leads. We discuss how this effect shapes the temperature dependence of the resistance as the spacing between the leads decreases. This work demonstrates that magnetic imaging with SSM is a powerful tool for local characterization of superconducting detectors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Al-Mn

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.175Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers