Doping dependence of the nonlinear Hall resistivity in electron-doped Pr$_{2-x}$Ce$_{x}$CuO$_{4 \pm δ}$
M. Dion, S. Ghotb, G. Hardy, P. Fournier
arXiv:2410.16614 · 2024-10-22
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report on a systematic study of the field dependence of the Hall resistivity $ρ_{yx} (B)$ as a function of doping in thin films of electron-doped superconducting cuprate Pr$_{2-x}$Ce$_{x}$CuO$_{4 \pm δ}$ (PCCO). Across the studied doping range from $x = 0.125$ to $x = 0.20$, we observe a nonlinear dependence of $ρ_{yx}$ with $B$. The leading $B^{3}$ nonlinear term is negative, increases with decreasing temperature and peaks around optimal doping ($x = 0.15$). The observed nonlinear contribution is consistent with the presence of two different types of free carriers (electron-like and hole-like) even for doping with only an apparent hole Fermi surface as observed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Based on an analysis using the two-carrier model, this negative nonlinear contribution to $ρ_{yx} (B)$ implies that the density of the charge carriers behaving like electrons is larger than the density of those behaving like holes for all the doping values explored. Combined with the Hall coefficient reaching $R_{H} = 0$ at specific temperatures for selected doping levels, we also conclude that the mobility of hole-like carriers is larger than that of electron-like carriers for doping around $x^{*} \approx 0.165$.
Similar papers
Planar thermal Hall effect from phonons in cuprates
similarity 0.94Lu Chen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.07696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity-driven ferromagnetism and superconductivity in the triangular Rashba-Hubbard model
similarity 0.93Mehdi Biderang et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.08931
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Luttinger semimetals near the SU(4) limit
similarity 0.93Majid Kheirkhah & Igor F. Herbut · 2023 · arXiv:2310.18157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the nature of the Schmid transition in a resistively shunted Josephson junction
similarity 0.92Romain Daviet & Nicolas Dupuis · 2023 · arXiv:2307.04835
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Field Superconducting Phases of Ultra Clean Single Crystal UTe2
similarity 0.92Dai Aoki et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.21689
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-Fermi liquid phase and linear-in-temperature scattering rate in overdoped two dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.92Wei Wu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.02635
Source status unknown — claims are unverified