Charge density waves and pinning by lattice anisotropy in 214 cuprates
Xiao Hu, Pedro M. Lozano, Feng Ye, Qiang Li, Jennifer Sears, Igor. A. Zaliznyak, Genda Gu, John M. Tranquada
arXiv:2410.23468 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.064504 · 2024-10-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The detection of static charge density waves (CDWs) in La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (LSCO) with x $\sim$ 0.12 at relatively high temperatures has raised the question of what lattice feature pins the CDWs. Some recent structural studies have concluded that some form of monoclinic distortion, indicated by the appearance of certain weak Bragg peaks (type M peaks) at otherwise forbidden positions, are responsible for CDW pinning. As a test of this idea, we present neutron diffraction results for a single crystal of La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$ (LBCO) with x = 1/8, which is known to undergo two structural transitions on cooling, from high-temperature tetragonal (HTT) to low-temperature orthorhombic (LTO) near 240 K, involving a collective tilt pattern of the corner-sharing CuO$_6$ octahedra, and from LTO to low temperature tetragonal (LTT) near 56 K, involving a new tilt pattern and the appearance of intensity at peaks of type T. We observe both type M and type T peaks in the LTT phase, while the type M peaks (but not type T) are still present in the LTO phase. Given that CDW order is observed only in the LTT phase of LBCO, it is apparent that the in-plane Cu-O bond anisotropy associated with the octahedral tilt pattern is responsible for charge pinning. We point out that evidence for a similar, but weaker, bond anisotropy has been observed previously in LSCO and should be responsible for CDW pinning there. In the case of LBCO, the monoclinic distortion may help to explain previously-reported magneto-optical evidence for gyrotropic order.
Similar papers
LaBaCuO as a superconducting Rosetta Stone
similarity 0.95John M. Tranquada · 2023 · arXiv:2310.15381
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological Doping and Superconductivity in Cuprates: An Experimental Perspective
similarity 0.95John M. Tranquada · 2021 · arXiv:2112.04557
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strongly-overdoped LaSrCuO: Evidence for Josephson-coupled grains of strongly-correlated superconductor
similarity 0.94Yangmu Li et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.01702
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In-situ scattering studies of superconducting vacancy-ordered monoclinic TiO thin films
similarity 0.93Merve Baksi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.16973
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic character of charge order in square planar low valence nickelates
similarity 0.92Y. Shen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.04184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elastocaloric evidence for a multicomponent superconductor stabilized within the nematic state in Ba(FeCo)As
similarity 0.92Sayak Ghosh et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.17945
Source status unknown — claims are unverified