Clear Reduction in Spin Susceptibility and Superconducting Spin Rotation for $H \parallel a$ in the Early-Stage Sample of Spin-Triplet Superconductor UTe$_2$
Shunsaku Kitagawa, Kousuke Nakanishi, Hiroki Matsumura, Yuki Takahashi, Kenji Ishida, Yo Tokunaga, Hironori Sakai, Shinsaku Kambe, Ai Nakamura, Yusei Shimizu, Yoshiya Homma, Dexin Li, Fuminori Honda, Atsushi Miyake, Dai Aoki
arXiv:2411.02698 · DOI 10.7566/JPSJ.93.123701 · 2024-11-05 · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the re-measurement of the $a$-axis spin susceptibility component in an early-stage sample of the spin-triplet superconductor UTe$_2$ with the transition temperature of $T_{\rm SC}$ = 1.6 K. Using Knight-shift measurements along the $b$ axis and at a 10-degree tilt from the $b$ axis towards the $a$ axis, we accurately determined the $a$-axis component without directly measuring the $a$-axis Knight shift. Our results reveal a decrease of approximately 3\% in the $a$-axis spin susceptibility in the superconducting state under $a$-axis magnetic field $μ_0 H_a \sim 0.1$ T, indicating that the spin susceptibility decreases similarly in both early-stage and ultraclean samples with $T_{\rm SC}$ = 2.1 K. The previously reported absence of the reduction in Knight shift is attributed to the missing of signal from the superconducting region and to the detection of residual signals from the non-superconducting region instead. We also found that the decrease in the $a$-axis spin susceptibility is immediately suppressed with increasing the $a$-axis magnetic field and is estimated to be completely suppressed at around 1.5 T due to superconducting spin rotation.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nonlinear diode effect and Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in purely two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.95Naratip Nunchot & Youichi Yanase · 2024 · arXiv:2409.16930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of uranium deficiency on normal and superconducting properties in unconventional superconductor UTe
similarity 0.94Y. Haga et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.13468
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Violation of the orbital depairing limit in a non-unitary state --on the high field phase in the heavy Fermion superconductor UTe--
similarity 0.93Kazushige Machida · 2023 · arXiv:2301.09035
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optically active Higgs and Leggett modes in multiband pair-density-wave superconductors with Lifshitz invariant
similarity 0.93Raigo Nagashima et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.18438
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous magnetic interference of cross-type Josephson junctions exposed to oblique magnetic fields
similarity 0.93Yasunori Mawatari · 2022 · arXiv:2202.04846
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical analysis of anisotropic upper critical field of superconductivity in nodal-line semimetals
similarity 0.92Junya Endo et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.15864
Source status unknown — claims are unverified