Evidence for Atomic-Scale Inhomogeneity in Superconducting Cuprate NMR
Jamil Tahir-Kheli
arXiv:2411.08142 · 2024-11-12
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In 1990, the Millis, Monien, and Pines (MMP) model and its improvement, the Zha, Barzykin, and Pines (ZBP) model in 1996, emerged as a realistic explanation of the cuprate NMR. These two models assume a single electronic component, translational symmetry, and that the electrons simultaneously have aspects of localized antiferromagnetic (AF) spins and delocalized Cu $d_{x^2-y^2}$ band states. NMR experiments were routinely fit to these models in the 1990s and early 2000s until they finally failed as NMR experiments developed further. It appears that cuprate theorists have given up on explaining the NMR and the NMR data is forgotten. Here, we assume a two-component model of electrons where the electrons reside in two regions, one metallic with delocalized band states, and the other antiferromagnetic with localized spins. This model breaks translational symmetry. We show that the normal state spin relaxation for the planar Cu, O, and Y atoms in $\mathrm{YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-δ}}$ and their Knight shifts are explained by this two-component model. The temperature dependence of the Cu spin relaxation rate anisotropy in the superconducting state is also explained qualitatively.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pseudogap and Superconducting Fluctuations in High-Tc Cuprates
similarity 0.88Shigeki Onoda & Masatoshi Imada · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0005371
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Coherence in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.88Dirk K. Morr & David Pines · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0004220
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic properties of the SO(5) theory for the antiferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity: a Monte Carlo study
similarity 0.87Xiao Hu · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9906237
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Spin Fluctuation Model for D-wave Superconductivity
similarity 0.87Andrey V. Chubukov et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0201140
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin excitations and mechanisms of superconductivity in cuprates
similarity 0.87Nikolay Plakida · 2011 · arXiv:1110.6715
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure and properties of superconducting materials with simple Fermi surfaces
similarity 0.87T. Jarlborg · 2014 · arXiv:1412.5301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified