Circuit Quantisation from First Principles
Yun-Chih Liao, Ben J. Powell, Thomas M. Stace
arXiv:2411.12236 · DOI 10.1103/dfrq-44vk · 2024-11-19 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting circuit quantisation conventionally starts from classical Euler-Lagrange circuit equations-of-motion. Invoking the correspondence principle yields a canonically quantised circuit description of circuit dynamics over a bosonic Hilbert space. This process has been very successful for describing experiments, but implicitly starts from the classical Ginsberg-Landau (GL) mean field theory for the circuit. Here we employ a different approach which starts from a microscopic fermionic Hamiltonian for interacting electrons, whose ground space is described by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) many-body wavefuction that underpins conventional superconductivity. We introduce the BCS ground-space as a subspace of the full fermionic Hilbert space, and show that projecting the electronic Hamiltonian onto this subspace yields the standard Hamiltonian terms for Josephson junctions, capacitors and inductors, from which standard quantised circuit models follow. Importantly, this approach does not assume a spontaneously broken symmetry, which is important for quantised circuits that support superpositions of phases, and the phase-charge canonical commutation relations are derived from the underlying fermionic commutation properties, rather than imposed. By expanding the projective subspace, this approach can be extended to describe phenomena outside the BCS ground space, including quasiparticle excitations.
Similar papers
Superconducting charge qubits from a microscopic many-body perspective
similarity 0.90D. A. Rodrigues et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0709.3460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd-frequency Pairing in Conventional Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.90Alexander V. Balatsky et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.07244
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Higgs gap modes in superconducting circuit quantisation
similarity 0.90Yun-Chih Liao et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2603.07035
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of Retardation in the Holstein-Hubbard Model: a two-site Calculation
similarity 0.89F. Marsiglio · 2022 · arXiv:2205.10352
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson network as a~model for high-temperature superconductor and beyond: Macroscopic quantum coherence probed by microwave absorption
similarity 0.89Adam Rycerz · 2026 · arXiv:2608.15441
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum electrodynamic fluctuations of the macroscopic Josephson phase
similarity 0.89H. Kohler et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0308567
Source status unknown — claims are unverified