Stripe Antiferromagnetic Ground-State Configuration of FeSe Revealed by Density Functional Theory
Luke Myers, Nigel Hew, Shun-Li Shang, Zi-Kui Liu
arXiv:2411.12261 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L121109 · 2024-11-19 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetic ground-state configuration of iron selenide FeSe has been a topic of debate, with experimental evidence suggesting the stripe spin fluctuations as predominant at low temperatures, while density functional theory (DFT) calculations using exchange-correlation (XC) functional of the Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA) have historically predicted the antiferromagnetic (AFM) dimer configuration. In this study, we utilize the $\text{r}^{2}\text{SCAN}$ functional, a variant of the Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed (SCAN) meta-GGA, to investigate the magnetic configurations of FeSe. It is found that $\text{r}^{2}\text{SCAN}$ predicts a stripe-AFM ground-state configuration with an anti-parallel spin alignment between layers. The energy difference between the parallel and anti-parallel inter-planar spin alignments is approximately 1.7 meV/atom, predicting a significant but previously unreported interlayer spin coupling not yet observed by experiments. The present study underscores the importance of accurate XC functionals, such as $\text{r}^{2}\text{SCAN}$, in predicting the magnetic ground-state configuration of complex materials like FeSe, highlighting its potential to predict magnetic interactions more reliably than traditional GGA functionals by adhering to exact constraints.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 100 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Proximity effect of s-wave superconductor on inversion broken Weyl Semi-Metal
similarity 0.96Robert Dawson & Vivek Aji · 2023 · arXiv:2312.00187
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The ab initio study of unconventional superconductivity in CeCoIn and FeSe
similarity 0.93Andrzej Ptok et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.01988
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting properties of MoTe from the anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory
similarity 0.92Hari Paudyal et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.04931
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The dawn of the nickel age of superconductivity
similarity 0.92Warren E. Pickett · 2021 · arXiv:2112.08436
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synergy and competition between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in FeSe under pressure
similarity 0.92Guan-Yu Chen et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1811.11599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin fluctuations in the ultranodal superconducting state of Fe(Se,S)
similarity 0.91Yifu Cao et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.03846
Source status unknown — claims are unverified