Charge density waves and superconductivity in the electron-positive fermion gas using a simple intuitive model. Part II: Collective modes, effective interactions, superconductivity, and transport
Carl A. Kukkonen
arXiv:2411.15916 · 2024-11-24
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity and the normal state electrical resistivity which varies as $T^2$ are strongly enhanced near the compressibility and charge density wave instabilities in the electron-positive fermion gas. The additional screening from the positive fermions introduces an attractive term in the effective electron-electron interaction that is the basis for superconductivity. Electron-positive fermion scattering is the source of the $T^2$ term in the electrical resistivity. At an instability, both interactions are divergent. The superconducting transition temperature is estimated using the McMillan formula. The electron-positive fermion gas conducts electricity and heat. Because electron-electron and positive fermion-positive fermion scattering conserve momentum, they do not contribute to the electrical resistivity, but electron-positive fermion scattering does. All three scattering mechanisms contribute to the thermal resistivity. The simple model for the electron-positive fermion gas is physically intuitive and naturally introduces instabilities at $q=0$ when the bulk modulus becomes zero and charge density waves at finite $q$ under some circumstances. For each mass ratio $M/m$, there is a unique density $r_s$ where the energy is a minimum. For different mass ratios, the interactions are investigated at several values of $r_s$ ranging from below the energy minimum to that of the instability.
Similar papers
Charge density waves and superconductivity in the electron-positive fermion gas using a simple intuitive model. Part I: The model, instabilities, and phase diagram
similarity 0.88Carl A. Kukkonen · 2024 · arXiv:2411.17001
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions in the Hubbard-Holstein model
similarity 0.87G. Aprea et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0601374
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between superconductivity and charge density waves
similarity 0.87Ki-Seok Kim · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0511620
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-electron bound states in parity-preserving QED_3 applied to high-T_c cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.87H. R. Christiansen et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0107155
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-temperature T resistivity in the underdoped pseudogap phase versus T-linear resistivity in the overdoped strange-metal phase of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.87Xingyu Ma et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.16778
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the attractive Hubbard model: functional renormalization group analysis
similarity 0.87R. Gersch et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0710.0238
Source status unknown — claims are unverified