Electronic structure of Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates: strain to mimic the effects pressure
Yi-Feng Zhao, Antia S. Botana
arXiv:2412.04391 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.115154 · 2024-12-05 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Signatures of superconductivity under pressure have recently been reported in the bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ and trilayer La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) nickelates with general chemical formula La$_{n+1}$Ni$_n$O$_{3n+1}$ ($n=$ number of perovskite layers along the $c$-axis). The emergence of superconductivity is always concomitant with a structural transition in which the octahedral tilts are suppressed, bringing the apical Ni-O-Ni angle to 180$^\circ$ and causing an increase in the out-of-plane $d_{z^2}$ orbital overlap. Due to this strong interlayer coupling, a flat band of pure $d_{z^2}$ character crosses the Fermi level. Here, using first-principles calculations, we explore biaxial strain (both compressive and tensile) as a means to mimic the electronic structure characteristics of RP nickelates (up to $n=5$) under hydrostatic pressure. Our findings highlight that strain allows to decouple the structural and electronic structure effects obtained under hydrostatic pressure: while compressive strain brings the apical Ni-O-Ni angle closer to 180$^\circ$, it shifts the $d_{z^2}$ flat bands away from the Fermi energy, giving rise to a more cuprate-like electronic structure. In contrast, tensile strain reduces the apical Ni-O-Ni angle (to values $\sim$ 160$^\circ$), but it recovers the flat $d_{z^2}$ band at the Fermi level appearing in the bilayer and trilayer RPs under pressure. Overall, strain represents a promising way to tune the electronic structure of RP nickelates and could be an alternative route to achieve superconductivity at ambient pressure in this family of materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd6Ni5O12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La4Ni3O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | 30 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Multiband Metallic Ground State in Multilayered Nickelates LaNiO and LaNiO Probed by La-NMR at Ambient Pressure
similarity 0.95Masataka Kakoi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.11844
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
orbital delocalization and magnetic collapse in superconducting (La,Pr)NiO films
similarity 0.91Xiaoyang Chen et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.21899
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic Origin of Density Wave Orders in a Trilayer Nickelate
similarity 0.91Jiangang Yang et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.22608
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resolving Structural Origins for Superconductivity in Strain-Engineered LaNiO Thin Films
similarity 0.91Lopa Bhatt et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2501.08204
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure and strain tuning of the alternating bilayer-trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate: crystal and electronic structure
similarity 0.91Huan Wu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2603.16072
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure and magnetic tendencies of trilayer LaNiO under pressure: structural transition, molecular orbitals, and layer differentiation
similarity 0.90Harrison LaBollita et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2402.05085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified