Using Principal Component Analysis to Distinguish Different Dynamic Phases in Superconducting Vortex Matter
C. J. O. Reichhardt, D. McDermott, C. Reichhardt
arXiv:2501.13269 · DOI 10.1103/physrevb.111.104508 · 2025-01-22 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Vortices in type-II superconductors driven over random disorder are known to exhibit a remarkable variety of distinct nonequilibrium dynamical phases that arise due to the competition between vortex-vortex interactions, the quenched disorder, and the drive. These include pinned states, elastic flows, plastic or disordered flows, and dynamically reordered moving crystal or moving smectic states. The plastic flow phases can be particularly difficult to characterize since the flows are strongly disordered. Here we perform principal component analysis (PCA) on the positions and velocities of vortex matter moving over random disorder for different disorder strengths and drives. We find that PCA can distinguish the known dynamic phases as well as or better than previous measures based on transport signatures or topological defect densities. In addition, PCA recognizes distinct plastic flow regimes, a slowly changing channel flow and a moving amorphous fluid flow, that do not produce distinct signatures in the standard measurements. Our results suggest that this position and velocity based PCA approach could be used to characterize dynamic phases in a broader class of systems that exhibit depinning and nonequilibrium phase transitions.
Similar papers
Using principal component analysis to distinguish different dynamic phases in superconducting vortex matter
similarity 0.92C. J. O. Reichhardt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Kibble-Zurek Scenario and Coarsening Across Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Driven Vortices and Skyrmions
similarity 0.89C. Reichhardt & C. J. O. Reichhardt · 2023 · arXiv:2307.02685
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex Shear Banding Transitions in Superconductors with Inhomogeneous Pinning Arrays
similarity 0.88C. Reichhardt & C. J. O. Reichhardt · 2019 · arXiv:1908.07606
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Currents and Vortex States at Fractional Matching Fields in Superconductors with Periodic Pinning
similarity 0.88Charles Reichhardt & Niels Gronbech-Jensen · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0008043
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
DC-driven separation of fractional flux quanta in two-band superconductors
similarity 0.88Anton O. Pokusinskyi & Oleksandr V. Dobrovolskiy · 2025 · arXiv:2503.23581
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pinning Induced Fluctuations on Driven Vortices
similarity 0.88Alejandro B. Kolton · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified