Pervasive symmetry-lowering nanoscale structural fluctuations in the cuprate La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$
R. J. Spieker, M. Spaić, I. Khayr, X. He, D. Zhai, Z. W. Anderson, N. Bielinski, F. Ye, Y. Liu, S. Chi, S. Sarker, M. J. Krogstad, R. Osborn, D. Pelc, M. Greven
arXiv:2502.02947 · 2025-02-05
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The cuprate superconductors are among the most widely studied quantum materials, yet there remain fundamental open questions regarding their electronic properties and the role of the structural degrees of freedom. Recent neutron and x-ray scattering measurements uncovered exponential scaling with temperature of the strength of orthorhombic fluctuations in the tetragonal phase of $La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4$ and $Tl_2Ba_2CuO_{6+y}$, unusual behavior that closely resembles prior results for the emergence of superconducting fluctuations, and that points to a common origin rooted in inherent correlated structural inhomogeneity. Here we extend the measurements of $La_{2-x}Sr_xCuO_4$ to higher temperatures in the parent compound (x=0) and to optimal doping (x=0.155), and we furthermore investigate the effects of in-situ in-plane uniaxial stress. Our neutron scattering result for undoped $La_2CuO_4$ complement prior x-ray data and reveal that the structural fluctuations persist to the maximum experimental temperature of nearly 1000K, i.e., to a significant fraction of the melting point. At this temperature, the spatial correlation length extracted from the momentum-space data is still about three lattice constants. The neutron scattering experiment enables quasistatic discrimination and reveals that the response is increasingly dynamic at higher temperatures. We also find that uniaxial stress up to 500 MPa along the tetragonal [110] direction, which corresponds to a strain of about 0.2%, does not significantly alter this robust behavior. Overall, these results support the notion that subtle, underlying inhomogeneity underpins the cuprate phase diagram. Finally, we uncover (for x=0.2) low-energy structural fluctuations at a nominally forbidden reflection. While the origin of these fluctuations is not clear, they might be related to the presence of extended defects such as dislocations or stacking faults.
Similar papers
Pervasive symmetry-lowering nanoscale structural fluctuations in the cuprate La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.99R. J. Spieker et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Static and dynamic spin fluctuations in superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.92R. J. Birgeneau et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Lattice instabilities and the effect of copper-oxygen-sheet distortions on superconductivity in doped La2CuO4
similarity 0.91M. K. Crawford et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive Excitations in the High-Temperature Superconductor La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.90N. B. Christensen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic parallel spin stripes from the 1/8 anomaly to the end of superconductivity in La1.6−xNd0.4SrxCuO4
similarity 0.90Qianli Ma et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Neutron diffraction evidence of microscopic charge inhomogeneities in the CuO2 plane of superconducting La2-xSrxCuO4 (0 < x <0.30)
similarity 0.90E. S. Bozin et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907017
Source status unknown — claims are unverified