An unusual first order phase transition in a 2D superconductor
Noah J. Jabusch, Emmanouil K. Kokkinis, Andrey V. Chubukov
arXiv:2502.13265 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.174507 · 2025-02-18
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider a superconductor under external perturbation, which forces Cooper pairs to develop with a finite total momentum $q$. The condensation energy of such a state decreases with $q$ and vanishes at a critical $q_c$. We analyze how superconducting order evolves at $ q \approx q_c$. In 3D, the result is well-known: the pairing susceptibility diverges at $q = q_c +0$, and the gap amplitude $Δ(q)$ gradually increases as $q$ decreases below $q_c$ and reaches its largest value $Δ_0$ at $q=0$. In 2D, we find different behavior. Namely, for a parabolic dispersion, the pairing susceptibility also diverges at $q = q_c +0$, but at $q = q_c -0$, the gap amplitude jumps to the maximal $Δ_0$ and remains equal to it for all $q <q_c$. For a non-parabolic dispersion $\varepsilon_{k}= c k^{2α}$, we find that for $α>1$ the transition becomes second-order, but the gap evolution is rather sharp, whereas for $α<1$ it becomes first-order, but $Δ(q)$ is non-monotonic. This is similar, but not identical, to the behavior of magnetization near a Stoner transition in 2D.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
First order phase transition in a two-dimensional superconductor
similarity 0.94N. J. Jabusch et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetism and Superconductivity in a Model with Extended Pairing Interactions
similarity 0.89Tulika Maitra et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0107496
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity from repulsive interaction
similarity 0.89Saurabh Maiti & Andrey V. Chubukov · 2013 · arXiv:1305.4609
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Condensation Energy and Spectral Functions in High Temperature Superconductors
similarity 0.89M. R. Norman et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9912043
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong-Coupling Superconductivity with Mixed Even- and Odd-Frequency Pairing
similarity 0.89Hiroaki Kusunose et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1205.5746
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonequilibrium dynamics of weakly and strongly paired superconductors
similarity 0.88V. Gurarie · 2009 · arXiv:0905.4498
Source status unknown — claims are unverified