Superconductivity Favored Anisotropic Phase Stiffness in Infinite-Layer Nickelates
Xu, Minyi, Qiu, Dong, Xu, Minghui, Guo, Yehao, Shen, Cheng, Yang, Chao, Sun, Wenjie, Nie, Yuefeng, Li, Zi-Xiang, Xiang, Tao, Qiao, Liang, Xiong, Jie, Li, Yanrong
arXiv:2502.14633 · 2025-02-21
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In unconventional superconductors such as cuprates and iron pnictides and chalcogenides, phase stiffness - a measure of the energy cost associated with superconducting phase variations - is on the same order of magnitude as the strength of Cooper pairing, translating to superconductivity governed by phase fluctuations. However, due to a lack of a direct experimental probe, there remains a fundamental gap in establishing microscopic picture between unconventional superconductivity and phase fluctuations. Here we show a vector current technique that allows for in-situ angle-resolved transport measurements, providing exclusive evidence suggesting an anisotropic nature of phase stiffness in infinite-layer nickelate superconductors. Pronounced anisotropy of in-plane resistance manifests itself in both normal and superconducting transition states, indicating crystal symmetry breaking. Remarkably, the electric conductivity of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 peaks at 125° between the direction of the current and crystal principal axis, but this angle evolves to 160° near zero-resistance temperature. Further measurements reveal that the superconductivity is favored along a direction with minimized phase fluctuations, an orientation strikingly deviating from the symmetric direction imposed by both electronic anisotropy and the underlying crystal lattice. Identical measurements conducted on a prototypical cuprate superconductor yield consistent results, suggesting that this previously unknown behavior could be ubiquitous. By shielding insight into the contrasting anisotropy between electron fluid and superfluid, our findings provide clues for a unified framework for understanding unconventional superconductors
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Isotropic Pauli-Limited Superconductivity in the Infinite Layer Nickelate NdSrNiO
similarity 0.91Bai Yang Wang et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.06560
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing symmetry in infinite-layer nickelate superconductor
similarity 0.89L. E. Chow et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.10038
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic nematic normal and superconducting state in electron-doped copper-oxide superconductors
similarity 0.88J. Y. Shen et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2506.14077
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning SQUID study of ferromagnetism and superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.88Ruby A. Shi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Isotropic Quantum Griffiths Singularity in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Infinite-Layer Superconducting Thin Films
similarity 0.87Qiang Zhao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nematicity as a Probe of Superconducting Pairing in Iron-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.87Rafael M. Fernandes & Andrew J. Millis
Source status unknown — claims are unverified