Andreev versus Tunneling Spectroscopy of Unconventional Flat Band Superconductors
Sayak Biswas, Saurav Suman, Mohit Randeria, Rajdeep Sensarma
arXiv:2503.07744 · 2025-03-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
STM experiments in the tunneling and Andreev regimes on graphene-based moire superconductors (SC) show two distinct energy scales whose origin is mysterious. We express the conductance of a normal-SC interface in terms of Green's functions, which allows us to sharpen the issues in two ways. First, we show that the two distinct energy scales cannot be understood in terms of a pseudogap in tunneling and a superconducting gap in the Andreev spectra. Second, the large Fermi velocity vF mismatch between the STM tip and the at band SC renormalizes a transparent interface towards the tunneling regime, and the ballistic Andreev regime cannot be realized in moire SCs. We also discuss self energy corrections to vF that determines the conductance. Finally, we offer a resolution to these problems by modeling the Andreev experiment as a circular metallic disc embedded in an unconventional SC. We show that with strong vF mismatch the low bias conductance is dominated by Andreev bound states induced by the tip at the interface with the unconventional SC. The ABS give rise to the low energy scale seen in Andreev experiments, smaller than the SC gap in tunneling spectroscopy.
Similar papers
Andreev and Single Particle Tunneling Spectroscopies in Underdoped Cuprates
similarity 0.90Kai-Yu Yang et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.3441
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection and order parameter symmetry in heavy-fermion superconductors: the case of CeCoIn
similarity 0.90Wan Kyu Park & Laura H. Greene · 2009 · arXiv:0902.1009
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stability of the boundary zero modes in one-dimensional topological superconductors
similarity 0.90K. V. Samokhin & B. P. Truong · 2017 · arXiv:1703.03399
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling conductance in Superconductor/Ferromagnet junctions: a self consistent approach
similarity 0.90Paul H. Barsic & Oriol T. Valls · 2008 · arXiv:0806.3416
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical conductivity of the Majorana mode at the s- and d-wave topological superconductor edge
similarity 0.90Lina Johnsen Kamra et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.17240
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-polarized multiple Andreev reflections in spin-split superconductors
similarity 0.90Bo Lu et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1907.07370
Source status unknown — claims are unverified