Upper critical fields in high-$ T_{\rm{c}} $ superconductors
Wei Wei, Yuling Xiang, Qiang Hou, Yue Sun, Zhixiang Shi
arXiv:2503.16224 · 2025-03-20
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Since the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity in cuprates, understanding the unconventional pairing mechanism has remained one of the most significant challenges. The upper critical field ($H_{\rm{c2}}$) is an essential parameter for obtaining information on the pair-breaking mechanism, coherence length $ξ$, and pairing symmetry, all of which are crucial for understanding unconventional superconducting mechanisms. Here, we provide a brief review of studies on $ H_{\rm{c2}} $ in several representative series of cuprate, iron-based, and nickelate superconductors. By comparing the behavior of $ H_{\rm{c2}} $ as a function of temperature, doping concentration, and anisotropy across these three major classes of superconductors, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of the complex pairing interactions in high-temperature superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xBaCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Temperature dependence and limiting mechanisms of the upper critical field of FeSe thin films
similarity 0.93M. Stanley et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.19241
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ginzburg-Landau expansion and the upper critical field in disordered attractive Hubbard model
similarity 0.93N. A. Kuleeva et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.07696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superconducting pairing strength near a nonmagnetic nematic quantum critical point
similarity 0.93K. Mukasa et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.11657
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large upper critical fields and dimensionality crossover of superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelate LaSrNiO
similarity 0.92Wei Wei et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.14196
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Practically universal representation of the Helfand-Werthamer upper critical field for any transport scattering rate
similarity 0.92Ruslan Prozorov & Vladimir G. Kogan · 2024 · arXiv:2407.15000
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structure, Composition, and High-Field Superconductivity in Metal-Rich -Carbide-Type Compounds
similarity 0.92Manuele Balestra et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.00894
Source status unknown — claims are unverified