Bootstrapping Flat-band Superconductors: Rigorous Lower Bounds on Superfluid Stiffness
Qiang Gao, Zhaoyu Han, Eslam Khalaf
arXiv:2506.18969 · 2025-06-23
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The superfluid stiffness fundamentally constrains the transition temperature of superconductors, especially in the strongly coupled regime. However, accurately determining this inherently quantum many-body property in microscopic models remains a significant challenge. In this work, we show how the \textit{quantum many-body bootstrap} framework, specifically the reduced density matrix (RDM) bootstrap, can be leveraged to obtain rigorous lower bounds on the superfluid stiffness in frustration-free interacting models with superconducting ground state. We numerically apply the method to a special class of frustration free models, which are known as quantum geometric nesting models, for flat-band superconductivity, where we uncover a general relation between the stiffness and the pair mass. Going beyond the familiar Hubbard case within this class, we find how additional interactions, notably simple magnetic couplings, can enhance the superfluid stiffness. Furthermore, we find that the RDM bootstrap unexpectedly reveals that the trion-type correlations are essential for bounding the stiffness, offering new insights on the structure of these models. A straightforward generalization of the method can lead to bounds on susceptibilities complementary to variational approaches. Our findings underscore the immense potential of the quantum many-body bootstrap as a powerful tool to derive rigorous bounds on physical quantities beyond energy.
Similar papers
Bootstrapping Flatband Superconductors: Rigorous Lower Bounds on Superfluid Stiffness
similarity 0.95Qiang Gao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exact models of chiral flat-band superconductors
similarity 0.87Zhaoyu Han et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2508.21127
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling unconventional superconductivity at the crossover between strong and weak electronic interactions
similarity 0.87Morten H. Christensen et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2006.11203
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting flat band superconductivity: dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings
similarity 0.86Kukka-Emilia Huhtinen et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.11133
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossing over from flat band superconductivity to conventional superconductivity
similarity 0.86M. Thumin & G. Bouzerar · 2025 · arXiv:2507.07701
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Simple Mechanism for Unconventional Superconductivity in a Repulsive Fermion Model
similarity 0.86Kevin Slagle & Yong Baek Kim · 2018 · arXiv:1805.05331
Source status unknown — claims are unverified