Non-Quantum-Critical Routes to Magnetic Superconductivity
Zhiqiang Wang, Ke Wang, K. Levin
arXiv:2506.18996 · 2026-07-25
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Electronic superconductivity is most commonly understood to be associated with magnetic quantum criticality. This framework is natural when a quantum critical point is present below the peak of the $T_c$ dome, but it is less satisfactory in the many systems where electronic superconductivity appears without a visible quantum critical point (QCP). Why and where does superconductivity emerge in such cases, given that its condensation energy is generally much smaller than the energy scale of the magnetic order itself? Here we develop an energetic perspective of this non-quantum-critical route to electronic superconductivity. When magnetic order becomes incipient but cannot be fully realized, the opening of a pairing gap lowers the free-energy cost of the nearby fluctuating magnetic state. This means that pairing can become strongest where long range order first becomes fragile. As a result, the strongest pairing tendency can sometimes occur at the edge of the superconducting dome closest to the loss of magnetism, even when $T_c$ itself is relatively small there. The relevant organizing principle is therefore not quantum criticality itself, but proximity to unrealized or disappearing magnetic order. Because many unconventional superconductors show no clear QCP, this perspective provides an alternative framework for understanding the phase diagram of a large class of electronic superconductors and may help identify new superconducting materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PuCoGa5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeRhIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeIrSi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiC2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2(AsP)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting dome in doped quasi-2d organic Mott insulators: a paradigm for strongly-correlated superconductivity
similarity 0.91Charles-David Hébert et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.07086
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity by Hidden Spin Fluctuations in Electron-Doped Iron Selenide
similarity 0.89J. P. Rodriguez · 2020 · arXiv:2001.07908
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical charge instability on verge of the Mott transition and the origin of quantum protection in high- cuprates
similarity 0.89T. K. Kopec · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0603342
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Acoustic-phonon-mediated superconductivity in moiréless graphene multilayers
similarity 0.89Yang-Zhi Chou et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.09811
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal liquid and s-wave superconductivity in transition metal dichalcogenides
similarity 0.89B. Uchoa et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0409471
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Criticality
similarity 0.89Subir Sachdev & Bernhard Keimer · 2011 · arXiv:1102.4628
Source status unknown — claims are unverified