Can slow recombination in ordered superconductors explain the excess quasiparticle population?
Eva Gurra, Douglas A. Bennett, Shannon M. Duff, Michael R. Vissers, Joel N. Ullom
arXiv:2507.03217 · 2025-07-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An excess density of quasiparticles is widely observed in superconducting films. This excess causes performance degradation in a variety of superconducting devices, including decoherence in qubits. In this Letter, we evaluate the hypothesis of [1] that the quasiparticle excess is caused by anomalously slow recombination at low quasiparticle densities due to localization in sub-gap states. We probe the density of states in aluminum and niobium films using current-voltage measurements of tunnel junctions and extract upper bounds on the energy scales of the sub-gap states and gap smearing. With these parameters, we evaluate the recombination times predicted by [1] and find that slow recombination is not predicted to occur at observed quasiparticle densities in aluminumand niobium-based superconducting devices. These results suggest that the quasiparticle excess in ordered superconductors is primarily due to non-thermal sources of quasiparticle generation and not slow recombination.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Optimal interlayer hopping and high temperature Bose-Einstein condensation of local pairs in quasi 2D superconductors
similarity 0.87P. E. Kornilovitch & J. P. Hague · 2014 · arXiv:1407.3040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergence of Topological Superconductivity in Doped Topological Dirac Semimetals under Symmetry-Lowering Lattice Distortions
similarity 0.86Sangmo Cheon et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.06806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time reversal invariant topological 1D and 2D superconductors: doubling the Sau-Luchtin-Tewari-Sarma and Oreg-Refael-von Oppen proposals
similarity 0.86Garry Goldstein · 2024 · arXiv:2403.01696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nuclear Spin-Lattice Relaxation Rate in Odd-Frequency Superconductivity
similarity 0.86Shumpei Iwasaki & Yoji Ohashi · 2024 · arXiv:2409.10894
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dimensional crossovers in the Gaussian critical fluctuations above of two-layer and three-layer superconductors
similarity 0.85A. S. Viz et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.18251
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetically induced Josephson nano-diodes in field-resilient superconducting microwave circuits
similarity 0.85Benedikt Wilde et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.16727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified