Triplet correlations in superconductor/antiferromagnet heterostructures: dependence on type of antiferromagnetic ordering
G. A. Bobkov, V. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, A. A. Golubov
arXiv:2508.00566 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-025-07077-5 · 2025-08-01 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In recent years, a number of studies have predicted the emergence of a nontrivial proximity effect in superconductor/antiferromagnet (S/AF) heterostructures. This effect is of considerable interest for the efficient integration of antiferromagnetic materials into the fields of superconducting spintronics and electronics. A key element of this proximity effect is the Neel triplet correlations, initially predicted for S/AF heterostructures with checkerboard G-type antiferromagnetic ordering. However, various forms of antiferromagnetic ordering exist, and an important open question concerns the generalization of these results to such cases. In this paper, we develop a theory of the proximity effect in S/AF heterostructures with arbitrary two-sublattice antiferromagnetic ordering, aiming to clarify which antiferromagnets are capable of inducing triplet correlations and what structure these correlations may exhibit. We show that, in S/AF heterostructures with collinear compensated antiferromagnets, the dominant superconducting triplet correlations are of the checkerboard Neel type, as originally predicted for G-type antiferromagnets. In contrast, layered Neel triplet correlations, although potentially generated by layered antiferromagnets, are significantly weaker. Consequently, in S/AF heterostructures with layered antiferromagnetic ordering, the proximity-induced triplet correlations may exhibit either a checkerboard Neel or a conventional ferromagnetic structure, depending on the specific antiferromagnet and its orientation relative to the S/AF interface.
Similar papers
The physics of superconductor-ferromagnet hybrid structures
similarity 0.92A. A. Golubov et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2509.16387
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range proximity effect for opposite-spin pairs in S/F heterostructures under non-equilibrium quasiparticle distribution
similarity 0.92I. V. Bobkova & A. M. Bobkov · 2012 · arXiv:1202.0165
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd triplet superconductivity in a superconductor/ferromagnet structure with a spiral magnetic structure
similarity 0.92A. F. Volkov et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0602522
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Accelerated vortex dynamics across the magnetic 3D-to-2D crossover in disordered superconductors
similarity 0.92Serena Eley et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02776
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex-driven superconducting diode effect in asymmetric multilayer heterostructures
similarity 0.92Jiong Li et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2603.25147
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin polarization and orbital effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
similarity 0.91A. F. Volkov et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1901.04446
Source status unknown — claims are unverified