Characterization of superconducting germanide and germanosilicide films of Pd, Pt, Rh and Ir formed by solid-phase epitaxy
Hao Li, Zhongxia Shang, Michael P. Lilly, Maksym Myronov, Leonid P. Rokhinson
arXiv:2509.14173 · DOI 10.1063/5.0301077 · 2025-09-17 · APL Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Facilitated by recent advances in strained Ge/SiGe quantum well (QW) growth technology, superconductor-semiconductor hybrid devices based on group IV materials have been developed, potentially augmenting the functionality of quantum circuits. The formation of highly transparent superconducting platinum germanosilicide (PtSiGe) contacts to Ge/SiGe heterostructures by solid-phase epitaxy between Pt and SiGe has recently been reported, although with a relatively low critical temperature $<1\,\mathrm{K}$. Here, we present a comparative study of the superconducting properties of Pt, Pd, Rh, and Ir germanides, along with an in-depth characterization of Ir(Si)Ge films formed by solid-phase epitaxy. For films fabricated under optimal epitaxy conditions, we report $T_\mathrm{c}=3.4\,\mathrm{K}$ ($2.6\,\mathrm{K}$ for IrGe (IrSiGe). High-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HRSTEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) reveal that Ir reacts with Ge substrates to form a polycrystalline IrGe layer with a sharp IrGe/Ge interface.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| PdGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.157 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| PtGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| RhGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.68 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| IrGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.44 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| PdSiGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.299 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| PtSiGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.585 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| IrSiGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.56 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| PtGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RhGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.96 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ta5Ge3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TaGe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| IrGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ir3Ge7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.87 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| IrGe4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.22 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Granular aluminum induced superconductivity in germanium for hole spin-based hybrid devices
similarity 0.90Giorgio Fabris et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.21364
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor to metal transition in overdoped cuprates
similarity 0.89Zi-Xiang Li et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.06091
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards the discovery of high critical magnetic field superconductors
similarity 0.88Benjamin Geisler et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.21044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of metal encapsulation on bulk superconducting properties of niobium thin films used in qubits
similarity 0.88Amlan Datta et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.07617
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current Induced Resistive State in Fe(Se,Te) Superconducting Nanobridges
similarity 0.88C. Nappi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1610.00437
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge density waves in cuprate superconductors beyond the critical doping
similarity 0.87H. Miao et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.10294
Source status unknown — claims are unverified