What causes the variation in superconducting properties of UTe$_{2}$?
C. S. Kengle, Noah Schnitzer, M. M. Bordelon, S. M. Thomas, P. F. S. Rosa
arXiv:2509.20298 · DOI 10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173650 · 2025-09-24 · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Reaching a consensus on the superconducting order parameter of unconventional superconductors remains a central challenge in the field of magnetically-mediated superconductivity. Though UTe$_{2}$ is largely accepted as a rare example of an odd-parity superconductor, its precise order parameter remains highly debated, even at ambient conditions. A key underlying issue is the large sample-to-sample variation in superconducting properties at zero applied pressure and magnetic field. Here, we investigate the origin of the observed variation by means of single crystal x-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) measurements. Our results reveal highly ordered crystalline lattices, in agreement with the expected $Immm$ structure, and no signs of uranium vacancies. Tiny amounts of interstitial defects, however, are observed on the Te2 layers that host Te chains along the b axis. We argue that these defects give rise to slightly enhanced atomic displacement parameters observed in SC-XRD data and are enough to disrupt the unconventional superconducting state in UTe$_{2}$. Our findings highlight the need to focus future order parameter determination efforts on single crystals of UTe$_{2}$ with minimal amounts of structural disorder.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.6 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.1 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
Similar papers
Theory of Magnetic Excitations in the Heavy-Fermion Spin-Triplet Superconductor UTe
similarity 0.91Koki Shimura et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2608.16350
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of gap structure of triplet superconductors from field-dependent Knight shift measurements
similarity 0.90Ge Wang et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.22723
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlated normal state fermiology and topological superconductivity in UTe2
similarity 0.89Hong Chul Choi et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.04876
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for a pressure-induced antiferromagnetic quantum critical point in intermediate valence UTe2
similarity 0.89S. M. Thomas et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.01659
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin caloritronics as a probe of nonunitary superconductors
similarity 0.89Taiki Matsushita et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.02633
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of Spontaneous Magnetic Fields Due to Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking in Bulk Superconducting UTe2
similarity 0.89Azari, N. et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.09773
Source status unknown — claims are unverified